head to head · open source
LosslessCut vs pho
LosslessCut has 45,774 GitHub stars, 2,309 forks, 300 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. pho has 1,173 stars, 97 forks, 55 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. LosslessCut leads on adoption by 3,802% (45,774 vs 1,173 stars). LosslessCut is written in TypeScript under GPL-2.0; pho is written in Dart under GPL-3.0. LosslessCut has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, pho 8%. LosslessCut was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LosslessCut | pho | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 46K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Dart |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.3K | ⑂ 97 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LosslessCut if
- You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick pho if
- You want the pho feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Dart
- You evaluated both and pho fits your workflow better
About LosslessCut
LosslessCut The swiss army knife of lossless video/audio editing Thanks to my supporters and everyone who purchased LosslessCut! LosslessCut aims to be the ultimate cross platform FFmpeg GUI for extremely fast and lossless operations on video, audio, subtitle and other related media files. The main feature is lossless trimming and cutting of video and audio files, which is great for saving space by rough cutting your large video files taken from a video camera, GoPro, drone, etc. It lets you quickly extract the good parts from your videos and discard many gigabytes of data without doing a slow re encode and…
read the full LosslessCut overview →
About pho
Pho 一个用于查看和上传照片的无服务端应用 中文 English 安装 开源版 （仅 Android APK）： 下载 APK — 仅含 SMB / WebDAV / NFS，无 Pro 功能 Pro 版 （含全部功能，需付费）： App Store — iOS 版，支持 AES 加密、并行上传、筛选器、百度网盘等 Google Play — Android 版，支持 AES 加密、并行上传、筛选器、百度网盘等 开源仓库仅提供 APK 下载。iOS 用户请前往 App Store、Android 用户请前往 Google Play 下载 Pro 版（支持免费试用基础功能后购买 Pro）。 介绍 该应用的目的是替代手机上的自带相册应用,并且能够将照片同步到网络储存. 功能简单,只是用于查看照片以及同步照片到网络储存.试图做到优秀的体验. 功能 本地照片查看 云端照片查看 增量同步照片到云端 后台定期同步 无数据库,无服务端 以时间组织云端存储的目录结构 支持的网络储存 [x] Samba [x] Webdav [x] NFS [ ] 阿里网盘 [ ] oneDrive [ ] google drive [ ] google photo 与 Pro 版本差异 本仓库为 Pho 开源版,仅包含核心的照片查看与同步功能.以下功能仅在 Pro 版本中提供(未开源): AES 加密上传(支持 AES 128 CFB 与 AES…
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Photo & Video Editors projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LosslessCut or pho more popular?
LosslessCut has 45,774 GitHub stars and pho has 1,173. LosslessCut has the larger community by that measure.
Are LosslessCut and pho free?
Both are open source. LosslessCut is licensed under GPL-2.0 and pho under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between LosslessCut and pho?
LosslessCut is written in TypeScript and pho in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LosslessCut or pho?
Choose LosslessCut if you want the larger community (45,774 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose pho if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.