head to head · open source

LosslessCut vs pho

LosslessCut has 43,978 GitHub stars, 2,186 forks, 300 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. pho has 1,165 stars, 95 forks, 55 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. LosslessCut leads on adoption by 3,675% (43,978 vs 1,165 stars). LosslessCut is written in TypeScript under GPL-2.0; pho is written in Dart under GPL-3.0. LosslessCut has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, pho 8%. LosslessCut was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LosslessCut ★ 44K pho ★ 1.2K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

LosslessCut pho
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 1.2K
License GPL-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Dart
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-08-20
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 95
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LosslessCut if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LosslessCut profile →

pick pho if

  • You want the pho feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You evaluated both and pho fits your workflow better

full pho profile →

About LosslessCut

LosslessCut is a cross platform desktop application for lossless editing of video, audio, and subtitle files. Built with Electron and TypeScript, it serves as a graphical interface to FFmpeg, enabling users to perform precise cuts, trims, merges, and track manipulations without re encoding, thus preserving original quality. It targets users who need to rapidly process media files—such as raw footage from cameras, drones, or smartphones—where re encoding would be time consuming and degrade fidelity.

read the full LosslessCut overview →

About pho

Pho is a serverless photo gallery and synchronization application, written in Dart with Flutter and an embedded Go backend, that lets people browse the photos on their phone and incrementally back them up to network storage they already own, and it is aimed at Android and iOS users who want to replace the built in gallery app.

read the full pho overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

LosslessCut vs OpenCut LosslessCut vs sharp LosslessCut vs rembg LosslessCut vs Audacity LosslessCut vs filepond LosslessCut vs Shotcut LosslessCut vs ImageToolbox LosslessCut vs palmier-pro LosslessCut vs Darktable LosslessCut vs libvips LosslessCut vs imgproxy LosslessCut vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is LosslessCut or pho more popular?

LosslessCut has 43,978 GitHub stars and pho has 1,165. LosslessCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are LosslessCut and pho free?

Both are open source. LosslessCut is licensed under GPL-2.0 and pho under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LosslessCut and pho?

LosslessCut is written in TypeScript and pho in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LosslessCut or pho?

Choose LosslessCut if you want the larger community (43,978 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose pho if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.