head to head · open source

OpenCut vs LosslessCut

OpenCut has 89,680 GitHub stars, 8,852 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. LosslessCut has 43,838 stars, 2,173 forks, 300 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. OpenCut leads on adoption by 105% (89,680 vs 43,838 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; LosslessCut is written in TypeScript under GPL-2.0. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, LosslessCut 5%. LosslessCut was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (editor), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 90K LosslessCut ★ 44K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut LosslessCut
GitHub stars ★ 90K ★ 44K
License MIT GPL-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-08-10 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 8.9K ⑂ 2.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick LosslessCut if

  • You want the LosslessCut feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and LosslessCut fits your workflow better

full LosslessCut profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut is a free, MIT licensed video editor that runs in the browser and is being rebuilt to serve web, desktop, and mobile from a single codebase, aimed at creators who want an open source alternative to CapCut.

read the full OpenCut overview →

About LosslessCut

LosslessCut is a cross platform desktop application for lossless editing of video, audio, and subtitle files. Built with Electron and TypeScript, it serves as a graphical interface to FFmpeg, enabling users to perform precise cuts, trims, merges, and track manipulations without re encoding, thus preserving original quality. It targets users who need to rapidly process media files—such as raw footage from cameras, drones, or smartphones—where re encoding would be time consuming and degrade fidelity.

read the full LosslessCut overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenBB ★ 73K Jellyfin ★ 57K Hyperswitch ★ 44K

Related comparisons

opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive home-assistant vs opencut opencut vs cratedb opencut vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenCut vs Audacity OpenCut vs Shotcut OpenCut vs Darktable OpenCut vs Krita OpenCut vs OpenShot OpenCut vs GIMP OpenCut vs Kdenlive OpenCut vs RawTherapee

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or LosslessCut more popular?

OpenCut has 89,680 GitHub stars and LosslessCut has 43,838. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and LosslessCut free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and LosslessCut under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and LosslessCut?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and LosslessCut in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or LosslessCut?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (89,680 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose LosslessCut if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.