head to head · open source

Godot vs three.js

Godot has 117,424 GitHub stars, 26,796 forks, 18,870 open issues and last shipped yesterday. three.js has 115,636 stars, 36,557 forks, 386 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Godot leads on adoption by 2% (117,424 vs 115,636 stars). Godot is written in C++ under MIT; three.js is written in JavaScript under MIT. Godot has attracted 23% as many forks as stars, three.js 32%. three.js was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Godot three.js
GitHub stars ★ 117K ★ 116K
License MIT MIT
Written in C++ JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 27K ⑂ 37K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Godot if

  • You weight community size — 117K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Godot profile →

pick three.js if

  • You want the three.js feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and three.js fits your workflow better

full three.js profile →

About Godot

Godot Engine is a free, MIT licensed, cross platform 2D and 3D game engine that ships an editor, a class reference, export templates, and one click deployment to desktop, mobile, web and console targets, aimed at game developers who want to own their toolchain and their games without royalties.

read the full Godot overview →

About three.js

three.js is an MIT licensed JavaScript 3D library that provides an easy to use, lightweight, cross browser, general purpose layer for rendering interactive 3D graphics in the browser, aimed at JavaScript developers who need 3D scenes on the web without writing raw GPU code.

read the full three.js overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenCut ★ 90K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant godot vs hey godot vs octobot godot vs sigle godot vs fleetbase firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

Godot vs imgui Godot vs bevy Godot vs raylib Godot vs GDevelop Godot vs MonoGame Godot vs Pumpkin Godot vs azerothcore-wotlk Godot vs zinx Godot vs s&box Godot vs pokerth

Frequently asked questions

Is Godot or three.js more popular?

Godot has 117,424 GitHub stars and three.js has 115,636. Godot has the larger community by that measure.

Are Godot and three.js free?

Both are open source. Godot is licensed under MIT and three.js under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Godot and three.js?

Godot is written in C++ and three.js in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Godot or three.js?

Choose Godot if you want the larger community (117,424 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose three.js if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.