head to head · open source

OpenCut vs ImageToolbox

OpenCut has 89,763 GitHub stars, 8,865 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. ImageToolbox has 14,666 stars, 631 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenCut leads on adoption by 512% (89,763 vs 14,666 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; ImageToolbox is written in Kotlin under Apache-2.0. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, ImageToolbox 4%. ImageToolbox was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 90K ImageToolbox ★ 15K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut ImageToolbox
GitHub stars ★ 90K ★ 15K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Kotlin
Last push 2026-08-10 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 8.9K ⑂ 631
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick ImageToolbox if

  • You want the ImageToolbox feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and ImageToolbox fits your workflow better

full ImageToolbox profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut is a free, MIT licensed video editor that runs in the browser and is being rebuilt to serve web, desktop, and mobile from a single codebase, aimed at creators who want an open source alternative to CapCut.

read the full OpenCut overview →

About ImageToolbox

ImageToolbox is a free and open source Android image editor written in Kotlin with Jetpack Compose and released under Apache 2.0, aimed at photographers, developers, and everyday Android users who need deep photo manipulation — crop, draw, filter chains, EXIF editing, background removal, and AI assisted enhancement — without analytics or crash reporting dependencies.

read the full ImageToolbox overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive home-assistant vs opencut opencut vs cratedb opencut vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenCut vs LosslessCut OpenCut vs sharp OpenCut vs rembg OpenCut vs Audacity OpenCut vs filepond OpenCut vs Shotcut OpenCut vs palmier-pro OpenCut vs Darktable OpenCut vs Krita OpenCut vs TagStudio OpenCut vs photoview OpenCut vs OpenShot

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or ImageToolbox more popular?

OpenCut has 89,763 GitHub stars and ImageToolbox has 14,666. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and ImageToolbox free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and ImageToolbox under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and ImageToolbox?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and ImageToolbox in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or ImageToolbox?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (89,763 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ImageToolbox if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.