head to head · open source

LosslessCut vs ImageToolbox

LosslessCut has 43,864 GitHub stars, 2,174 forks, 300 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. ImageToolbox has 14,666 stars, 631 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LosslessCut leads on adoption by 199% (43,864 vs 14,666 stars). LosslessCut is written in TypeScript under GPL-2.0; ImageToolbox is written in Kotlin under Apache-2.0. LosslessCut has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, ImageToolbox 4%. ImageToolbox was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LosslessCut ★ 44K ImageToolbox ★ 15K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

LosslessCut ImageToolbox
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 15K
License GPL-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 631
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LosslessCut if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LosslessCut profile →

pick ImageToolbox if

  • You want the ImageToolbox feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and ImageToolbox fits your workflow better

full ImageToolbox profile →

About LosslessCut

LosslessCut is a cross platform desktop application for lossless editing of video, audio, and subtitle files. Built with Electron and TypeScript, it serves as a graphical interface to FFmpeg, enabling users to perform precise cuts, trims, merges, and track manipulations without re encoding, thus preserving original quality. It targets users who need to rapidly process media files—such as raw footage from cameras, drones, or smartphones—where re encoding would be time consuming and degrade fidelity.

read the full LosslessCut overview →

About ImageToolbox

ImageToolbox is a free and open source Android image editor written in Kotlin with Jetpack Compose and released under Apache 2.0, aimed at photographers, developers, and everyday Android users who need deep photo manipulation — crop, draw, filter chains, EXIF editing, background removal, and AI assisted enhancement — without analytics or crash reporting dependencies.

read the full ImageToolbox overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

LosslessCut vs OpenCut LosslessCut vs sharp LosslessCut vs rembg LosslessCut vs Audacity LosslessCut vs filepond LosslessCut vs Shotcut LosslessCut vs palmier-pro LosslessCut vs Darktable LosslessCut vs Krita LosslessCut vs TagStudio LosslessCut vs photoview LosslessCut vs OpenShot

Frequently asked questions

Is LosslessCut or ImageToolbox more popular?

LosslessCut has 43,864 GitHub stars and ImageToolbox has 14,666. LosslessCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are LosslessCut and ImageToolbox free?

Both are open source. LosslessCut is licensed under GPL-2.0 and ImageToolbox under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LosslessCut and ImageToolbox?

LosslessCut is written in TypeScript and ImageToolbox in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LosslessCut or ImageToolbox?

Choose LosslessCut if you want the larger community (43,864 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose ImageToolbox if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.