head to head · open source
firecrawl vs cap
firecrawl has 197,942 GitHub stars, 10,457 forks, 621 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cap has 24,271 stars, 2,234 forks, 339 open issues and last shipped yesterday. firecrawl leads on adoption by 716% (197,942 vs 24,271 stars). firecrawl is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; cap is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence. firecrawl has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, cap 9%. firecrawl was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| firecrawl | cap | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 198K | ★ 24K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Custom / other |
| Written in | TypeScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 10K | ⑂ 2.2K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick firecrawl if
- You weight community size — 198K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick cap if
- You want the cap feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and cap fits your workflow better
About firecrawl
🔥 Firecrawl The API to search, scrape, and interact with the web at scale. 🔥 The web context API to find sources, extract content, and turn it into clean Markdown or structured data your agents can ship with. Open source and available as a hosted service. Pst. Hey, you, join our stargazers :) Why Firecrawl? Industry leading reliability : Covers 96% of the web, including JS heavy pages — no proxy headaches, just clean data (see benchmarks) Blazingly fast : P95 latency of 3.4s across millions of pages, built for real time agents and dynamic apps LLM ready output : Clean markdown, structured JSON, screenshots…
read the full firecrawl overview →
About cap
Cap Beautiful, shareable screen recordings. Open source, fast, and built for teams that want to own their data. Website Download Docs Pricing Discord Cap is the open source alternative to Loom. It gives you fast screen recording, polished local editing, instant share links, comments, transcripts, analytics, team workspaces, custom domains, custom S3 storage, and full self hosting when you need complete control. Use Cap for product demos, bug reports, onboarding, tutorials, design reviews, engineering walkthroughs, async standups, client updates, and any moment where showing the work is faster than scheduling…
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Is firecrawl or cap more popular?
firecrawl has 197,942 GitHub stars and cap has 24,271. firecrawl has the larger community by that measure.
Are firecrawl and cap free?
Both are open source. firecrawl is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and cap has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between firecrawl and cap?
firecrawl is written in TypeScript and cap in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, firecrawl or cap?
Choose firecrawl if you want the larger community (197,942 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose cap if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.