head to head · open source

OpenCut vs sharp

OpenCut has 89,763 GitHub stars, 8,865 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. sharp has 32,692 stars, 1,436 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. OpenCut leads on adoption by 175% (89,763 vs 32,692 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; sharp is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, sharp 4%. sharp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 90K sharp ★ 33K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut sharp
GitHub stars ★ 90K ★ 33K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-08-10 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 8.9K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick sharp if

  • You want the sharp feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and sharp fits your workflow better

full sharp profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut is a free, MIT licensed video editor that runs in the browser and is being rebuilt to serve web, desktop, and mobile from a single codebase, aimed at creators who want an open source alternative to CapCut.

read the full OpenCut overview →

About sharp

sharp is a high performance Node.js image processing library that converts large images in common formats into smaller, web friendly JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF and AVIF files, and it is built for JavaScript developers who need fast, dependency light resizing inside Node.js, Deno or Bun applications.

read the full sharp overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive home-assistant vs opencut opencut vs cratedb opencut vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenCut vs LosslessCut OpenCut vs rembg OpenCut vs Audacity OpenCut vs filepond OpenCut vs Shotcut OpenCut vs ImageToolbox OpenCut vs palmier-pro OpenCut vs Darktable OpenCut vs Krita OpenCut vs TagStudio OpenCut vs photoview OpenCut vs OpenShot

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or sharp more popular?

OpenCut has 89,763 GitHub stars and sharp has 32,692. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and sharp free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and sharp under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and sharp?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and sharp in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or sharp?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (89,763 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose sharp if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.