head to head · open source

OpenCut vs filepond

OpenCut has 89,763 GitHub stars, 8,865 forks, 378 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. filepond has 16,393 stars, 848 forks, 142 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. OpenCut leads on adoption by 448% (89,763 vs 16,393 stars). OpenCut is written in TypeScript under MIT; filepond is written in JavaScript under MIT. OpenCut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, filepond 5%. filepond was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCut ★ 90K filepond ★ 16K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCut filepond
GitHub stars ★ 90K ★ 16K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-08-10 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 8.9K ⑂ 848
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCut if

  • You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCut profile →

pick filepond if

  • You want the filepond feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and filepond fits your workflow better

full filepond profile →

About OpenCut

OpenCut is a free, MIT licensed video editor that runs in the browser and is being rebuilt to serve web, desktop, and mobile from a single codebase, aimed at creators who want an open source alternative to CapCut.

read the full OpenCut overview →

About filepond

FilePond is an MIT licensed JavaScript file upload library for front end developers who need drag and drop, clipboard paste, API driven uploads, and automatic image optimization in one dependency.

read the full filepond overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive home-assistant vs opencut opencut vs cratedb opencut vs fleetbase firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

OpenCut vs LosslessCut OpenCut vs sharp OpenCut vs rembg OpenCut vs Audacity OpenCut vs Shotcut OpenCut vs ImageToolbox OpenCut vs palmier-pro OpenCut vs Darktable OpenCut vs Krita OpenCut vs TagStudio OpenCut vs photoview OpenCut vs OpenShot

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCut or filepond more popular?

OpenCut has 89,763 GitHub stars and filepond has 16,393. OpenCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCut and filepond free?

Both are open source. OpenCut is licensed under MIT and filepond under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCut and filepond?

OpenCut is written in TypeScript and filepond in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCut or filepond?

Choose OpenCut if you want the larger community (89,763 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose filepond if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.