head to head · open source

LosslessCut vs filepond

LosslessCut has 43,864 GitHub stars, 2,174 forks, 300 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. filepond has 16,393 stars, 848 forks, 142 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. LosslessCut leads on adoption by 168% (43,864 vs 16,393 stars). LosslessCut is written in TypeScript under GPL-2.0; filepond is written in JavaScript under MIT. LosslessCut has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, filepond 5%. filepond was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LosslessCut ★ 44K filepond ★ 16K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

LosslessCut filepond
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 16K
License GPL-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 848
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LosslessCut if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LosslessCut profile →

pick filepond if

  • You want the filepond feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and filepond fits your workflow better

full filepond profile →

About LosslessCut

LosslessCut is a cross platform desktop application for lossless editing of video, audio, and subtitle files. Built with Electron and TypeScript, it serves as a graphical interface to FFmpeg, enabling users to perform precise cuts, trims, merges, and track manipulations without re encoding, thus preserving original quality. It targets users who need to rapidly process media files—such as raw footage from cameras, drones, or smartphones—where re encoding would be time consuming and degrade fidelity.

read the full LosslessCut overview →

About filepond

FilePond is an MIT licensed JavaScript file upload library for front end developers who need drag and drop, clipboard paste, API driven uploads, and automatic image optimization in one dependency.

read the full filepond overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs darktable opencut vs krita opencut vs openshot opencut vs gimp opencut vs kdenlive firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

LosslessCut vs OpenCut LosslessCut vs sharp LosslessCut vs rembg LosslessCut vs Audacity LosslessCut vs Shotcut LosslessCut vs ImageToolbox LosslessCut vs palmier-pro LosslessCut vs Darktable LosslessCut vs Krita LosslessCut vs TagStudio LosslessCut vs photoview LosslessCut vs OpenShot

Frequently asked questions

Is LosslessCut or filepond more popular?

LosslessCut has 43,864 GitHub stars and filepond has 16,393. LosslessCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are LosslessCut and filepond free?

Both are open source. LosslessCut is licensed under GPL-2.0 and filepond under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LosslessCut and filepond?

LosslessCut is written in TypeScript and filepond in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LosslessCut or filepond?

Choose LosslessCut if you want the larger community (43,864 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose filepond if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.