head to head · open source
LosslessCut vs Foxel
LosslessCut has 45,804 GitHub stars, 2,312 forks, 300 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Foxel has 1,153 stars, 104 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. LosslessCut leads on adoption by 3,873% (45,804 vs 1,153 stars). LosslessCut is written in TypeScript under GPL-2.0; Foxel is written in Python under MIT. LosslessCut has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Foxel 9%. Foxel was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (video), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LosslessCut | Foxel | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 46K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-05 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.3K | ⑂ 104 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LosslessCut if
- You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Foxel if
- You want the Foxel feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Foxel fits your workflow better
About LosslessCut
LosslessCut The swiss army knife of lossless video/audio editing Thanks to my supporters and everyone who purchased LosslessCut! LosslessCut aims to be the ultimate cross platform FFmpeg GUI for extremely fast and lossless operations on video, audio, subtitle and other related media files. The main feature is lossless trimming and cutting of video and audio files, which is great for saving space by rough cutting your large video files taken from a video camera, GoPro, drone, etc. It lets you quickly extract the good parts from your videos and discard many gigabytes of data without doing a slow re encode and…
read the full LosslessCut overview →
About Foxel
English 简体中文 Foxel A highly extensible private cloud storage solution for individuals and teams, featuring AI powered semantic search. The ocean of data is boundless, let the eye of insight guide the voyage, yet its intricate connections lie deep, not fully discernible from the surface. 👀 Online Demo Account/Password: admin / admin ✨ Core Features 📁 Unified File Management Centralize management of files distributed across different storage backends. Browse, upload, download, move, copy, and delete — all through a single, unified interface. 🔌 Pluggable Storage Backends Utilizes an extensible adapter pattern to…
read the full Foxel overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Photo & Video Editors projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LosslessCut or Foxel more popular?
LosslessCut has 45,804 GitHub stars and Foxel has 1,153. LosslessCut has the larger community by that measure.
Are LosslessCut and Foxel free?
Both are open source. LosslessCut is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Foxel under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between LosslessCut and Foxel?
LosslessCut is written in TypeScript and Foxel in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LosslessCut or Foxel?
Choose LosslessCut if you want the larger community (45,804 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose Foxel if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.