head to head · open source
LosslessCut vs foldergram
LosslessCut has 46,011 GitHub stars, 2,330 forks, 300 open issues and last shipped today. foldergram has 606 stars, 36 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. LosslessCut leads on adoption by 7,493% (46,011 vs 606 stars). LosslessCut is written in TypeScript under GPL-2.0; foldergram is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. LosslessCut has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, foldergram 6%. LosslessCut was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ffmpeg), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LosslessCut | foldergram | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 46K | ★ 606 |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-14 | 2026-11-08 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.3K | ⑂ 36 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LosslessCut if
- You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick foldergram if
- You want the foldergram feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and foldergram fits your workflow better
About LosslessCut
LosslessCut The swiss army knife of lossless video/audio editing Thanks to my supporters and everyone who purchased LosslessCut! LosslessCut aims to be the ultimate cross platform FFmpeg GUI for extremely fast and lossless operations on video, audio, subtitle and other related media files. The main feature is lossless trimming and cutting of video and audio files, which is great for saving space by rough cutting your large video files taken from a video camera, GoPro, drone, etc. It lets you quickly extract the good parts from your videos and discard many gigabytes of data without doing a slow re encode and…
read the full LosslessCut overview →
About foldergram
Foldergram Local only photo and video gallery for folders, with an Instagram inspired browsing pattern. Live Demo • Features • Installation • Configuration • Tech Stack • Contributing Try the public demo: foldergram.intentdeep.com Foldergram is a self hosted web application that turns your local folders into a beautiful, instagram style feed and profile. It turns your local folder to app folders (profiles), and serves a lightning fast Progressive Web App (PWA). Foldergram indexes supported media from a configured GALLERY ROOT , stores metadata in SQLite, generates thumbnails and previews, and serves a fast feed…
read the full foldergram overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Photo & Video Editors projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LosslessCut or foldergram more popular?
LosslessCut has 46,011 GitHub stars and foldergram has 606. LosslessCut has the larger community by that measure.
Are LosslessCut and foldergram free?
Both are open source. LosslessCut is licensed under GPL-2.0 and foldergram under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between LosslessCut and foldergram?
LosslessCut is written in TypeScript and foldergram in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LosslessCut or foldergram?
Choose LosslessCut if you want the larger community (46,011 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose foldergram if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.