head to head · open source
LosslessCut vs foldergram
LosslessCut has 44,140 GitHub stars, 2,188 forks, 300 open issues and last shipped yesterday. foldergram has 568 stars, 34 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 26 days ago. LosslessCut leads on adoption by 7,671% (44,140 vs 568 stars). LosslessCut is written in TypeScript under GPL-2.0; foldergram is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. LosslessCut has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, foldergram 6%. LosslessCut was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ffmpeg), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LosslessCut | foldergram | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 44K | ★ 568 |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-28 | 2026-09-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.2K | ⑂ 34 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LosslessCut if
- You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick foldergram if
- You want the foldergram feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and foldergram fits your workflow better
About LosslessCut
LosslessCut is a cross platform desktop application for lossless editing of video, audio, and subtitle files. Built with Electron and TypeScript, it serves as a graphical interface to FFmpeg, enabling users to perform precise cuts, trims, merges, and track manipulations without re encoding, thus preserving original quality. It targets users who need to rapidly process media files—such as raw footage from cameras, drones, or smartphones—where re encoding would be time consuming and degrade fidelity.
read the full LosslessCut overview →
About foldergram
Foldergram is a self hosted, folder based photo and video gallery that turns an existing directory of local media into an Instagram style feed and profile, and it is aimed at individuals and small teams who want to browse their own files through a fast Progressive Web App without uploading anything to a cloud service.
read the full foldergram overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Photo & Video Editors projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LosslessCut or foldergram more popular?
LosslessCut has 44,140 GitHub stars and foldergram has 568. LosslessCut has the larger community by that measure.
Are LosslessCut and foldergram free?
Both are open source. LosslessCut is licensed under GPL-2.0 and foldergram under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between LosslessCut and foldergram?
LosslessCut is written in TypeScript and foldergram in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LosslessCut or foldergram?
Choose LosslessCut if you want the larger community (44,140 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose foldergram if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.