head to head · open source
LosslessCut vs chronoframe
LosslessCut has 45,679 GitHub stars, 2,303 forks, 300 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. chronoframe has 1,969 stars, 155 forks, 51 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LosslessCut leads on adoption by 2,220% (45,679 vs 1,969 stars). LosslessCut is written in TypeScript under GPL-2.0; chronoframe is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. LosslessCut has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, chronoframe 8%. chronoframe was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LosslessCut | chronoframe | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 46K | ★ 2.0K |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.3K | ⑂ 155 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LosslessCut if
- You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick chronoframe if
- You want the chronoframe feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and chronoframe fits your workflow better
About LosslessCut
LosslessCut The swiss army knife of lossless video/audio editing Thanks to my supporters and everyone who purchased LosslessCut! LosslessCut aims to be the ultimate cross platform FFmpeg GUI for extremely fast and lossless operations on video, audio, subtitle and other related media files. The main feature is lossless trimming and cutting of video and audio files, which is great for saving space by rough cutting your large video files taken from a video camera, GoPro, drone, etc. It lets you quickly extract the good parts from your videos and discard many gigabytes of data without doing a slow re encode and…
read the full LosslessCut overview →
About chronoframe
ChronoFrame Languages: English 中文 A smooth photo display and management application, supporting multiple image formats and large size image rendering. Live Demo: TimoYin's Mems ✨ Features 🖼️ Powerful Photo Management Manage photos online Easily manage and browse photos via the web interface Explore map Browse photo locations on a map Smart EXIF parsing Automatically extracts metadata such as capture time, geolocation, and camera parameters Reverse geocoding Automatically identifies photo shooting locations Multi format support Supports mainstream formats including JPEG, PNG, HEIC/HEIF Smart thumbnails Efficient…
read the full chronoframe overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Photo & Video Editors projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LosslessCut or chronoframe more popular?
LosslessCut has 45,679 GitHub stars and chronoframe has 1,969. LosslessCut has the larger community by that measure.
Are LosslessCut and chronoframe free?
Both are open source. LosslessCut is licensed under GPL-2.0 and chronoframe under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between LosslessCut and chronoframe?
LosslessCut is written in TypeScript and chronoframe in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LosslessCut or chronoframe?
Choose LosslessCut if you want the larger community (45,679 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose chronoframe if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.