head to head · open source

LosslessCut vs agent-plugin

LosslessCut has 45,728 GitHub stars, 2,305 forks, 300 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. agent-plugin has 1,006 stars, 84 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LosslessCut leads on adoption by 4,446% (45,728 vs 1,006 stars). LosslessCut is written in TypeScript under GPL-2.0; agent-plugin is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. LosslessCut has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, agent-plugin 8%. agent-plugin was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LosslessCut ★ 46K agent-plugin ★ 1.0K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

LosslessCut agent-plugin
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 1.0K
License GPL-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-11-03 2026-11-05
Forks ⑂ 2.3K ⑂ 84
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LosslessCut if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LosslessCut profile →

pick agent-plugin if

  • You want the agent-plugin feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and agent-plugin fits your workflow better

full agent-plugin profile →

About LosslessCut

LosslessCut The swiss army knife of lossless video/audio editing Thanks to my supporters and everyone who purchased LosslessCut! LosslessCut aims to be the ultimate cross platform FFmpeg GUI for extremely fast and lossless operations on video, audio, subtitle and other related media files. The main feature is lossless trimming and cutting of video and audio files, which is great for saving space by rough cutting your large video files taken from a video camera, GoPro, drone, etc. It lets you quickly extract the good parts from your videos and discard many gigabytes of data without doing a slow re encode and…

read the full LosslessCut overview →

About agent-plugin

ChatCut Agent Plugins ChatCut is an AI video editor for agents: an MCP server and plugin that lets Codex, ChatGPT, Claude Code, Cursor, Grok Bot, Gemini CLI, Google Antigravity, Kimi Work, WorkBuddy, Doubao Work and Qwen Work edit your own footage, add captions and subtitles, remove silences and filler words, create motion graphics, generate video, voiceovers and music, and export an editable timeline. \ Website · Setup guide · ChatGPT and Codex · Claude Code · Pricing AI video editing for your agent. The ChatCut Agent Plugins connect Codex, Claude Code, Grok Bot, Cursor, Google Antigravity, Kimi Work…

read the full agent-plugin overview →

More in Miscellaneous

Related comparisons

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

Frequently asked questions

Is LosslessCut or agent-plugin more popular?

LosslessCut has 45,728 GitHub stars and agent-plugin has 1,006. LosslessCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are LosslessCut and agent-plugin free?

Both are open source. LosslessCut is licensed under GPL-2.0 and agent-plugin under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LosslessCut and agent-plugin?

LosslessCut is written in TypeScript and agent-plugin in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LosslessCut or agent-plugin?

Choose LosslessCut if you want the larger community (45,728 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose agent-plugin if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.