head to head · open source

Ghosten-Player vs rtp2httpd

Ghosten-Player has 3,299 GitHub stars, 201 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. rtp2httpd has 2,102 stars, 326 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Ghosten-Player leads on adoption by 57% (3,299 vs 2,102 stars). Ghosten-Player is written in Dart under AGPL-3.0; rtp2httpd is written in C under GPL-2.0. Ghosten-Player has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, rtp2httpd 16%. rtp2httpd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (iptv), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ghosten-Player ★ 3.3K rtp2httpd ★ 2.1K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ghosten-Player rtp2httpd
GitHub stars ★ 3.3K ★ 2.1K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-2.0
Written in Dart C
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 201 ⑂ 326
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ghosten-Player if

  • You weight community size — 3.3K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ghosten-Player profile →

pick rtp2httpd if

  • You want the rtp2httpd feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and rtp2httpd fits your workflow better

full rtp2httpd profile →

About Ghosten-Player

Ghosten Player is a Flutter based video player for Android phone, pad, and TV, with Windows and macOS support in development. It is a Dart app under AGPL 3.0 in the Android media and streaming ecosystem. The project gathers video resources into a local private media library instead of requiring a hosted backend.

read the full Ghosten-Player overview →

About rtp2httpd

rtp2httpd is a C based IPTV streaming forwarder that converts multicast RTP/UDP and RTSP sources into unicast HTTP streams for clients that cannot join multicast directly. It lives in the IPTV media streaming ecosystem, with topics including china iptv, iptv, iptv m3u, iptv player, msd lite, multicast, rtp, rtp proxy, rtsp proxy, and udpxy.

read the full rtp2httpd overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Ghosten-Player vs Jellyfin Ghosten-Player vs Invidious Ghosten-Player vs Navidrome Ghosten-Player vs neko Ghosten-Player vs Kodi Ghosten-Player vs Nuclear Ghosten-Player vs PeerTube Ghosten-Player vs iptv-sources Ghosten-Player vs ansible-nas Ghosten-Player vs Anthias Ghosten-Player vs tvheadend Ghosten-Player vs BookWyrm

Frequently asked questions

Is Ghosten-Player or rtp2httpd more popular?

Ghosten-Player has 3,299 GitHub stars and rtp2httpd has 2,102. Ghosten-Player has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ghosten-Player and rtp2httpd free?

Both are open source. Ghosten-Player is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and rtp2httpd under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Ghosten-Player and rtp2httpd?

Ghosten-Player is written in Dart and rtp2httpd in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ghosten-Player or rtp2httpd?

Choose Ghosten-Player if you want the larger community (3,299 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose rtp2httpd if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.