head to head · open source

Kodi vs Ghosten-Player

Kodi has 21,233 GitHub stars, 6,603 forks, 466 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Ghosten-Player has 3,299 stars, 201 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Kodi leads on adoption by 544% (21,233 vs 3,299 stars). Kodi is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence; Ghosten-Player is written in Dart under AGPL-3.0. Kodi has attracted 31% as many forks as stars, Ghosten-Player 6%. Kodi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Kodi ★ 21K Ghosten-Player ★ 3.3K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Kodi Ghosten-Player
GitHub stars ★ 21K ★ 3.3K
License Custom / other AGPL-3.0
Written in C++ Dart
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 201
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Kodi if

  • You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Kodi profile →

pick Ghosten-Player if

  • You want the Ghosten-Player feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You evaluated both and Ghosten-Player fits your workflow better

full Ghosten-Player profile →

About Kodi

Kodi is a free and open source home theater and media center application, also described as an entertainment hub for digital media. It is written mainly in C++ and distributed as a native application for Android, BSD, Linux, macOS, iOS, tvOS, and Windows, with support for many common processor architectures. The project began in 2003 and is run by the XBMC Foundation, with development and support carried out by volunteers worldwide.

read the full Kodi overview →

About Ghosten-Player

Ghosten Player is a Flutter based video player for Android phone, pad, and TV, with Windows and macOS support in development. It is a Dart app under AGPL 3.0 in the Android media and streaming ecosystem. The project gathers video resources into a local private media library instead of requiring a hosted backend.

read the full Ghosten-Player overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Kodi vs Jellyfin Kodi vs Invidious Kodi vs Navidrome Kodi vs neko Kodi vs Nuclear Kodi vs PeerTube Kodi vs iptv-sources Kodi vs ansible-nas Kodi vs Anthias Kodi vs tvheadend Kodi vs BookWyrm Kodi vs mytv-android

Frequently asked questions

Is Kodi or Ghosten-Player more popular?

Kodi has 21,233 GitHub stars and Ghosten-Player has 3,299. Kodi has the larger community by that measure.

Are Kodi and Ghosten-Player free?

Both are open source. Kodi has no licence declared in this registry, and Ghosten-Player is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Kodi and Ghosten-Player?

Kodi is written in C++ and Ghosten-Player in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Kodi or Ghosten-Player?

Choose Kodi if you want the larger community (21,233 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Ghosten-Player if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.