head to head · open source

Nuclear vs Ghosten-Player

Nuclear has 18,480 GitHub stars, 1,327 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped today. Ghosten-Player has 3,299 stars, 201 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Nuclear leads on adoption by 460% (18,480 vs 3,299 stars). Nuclear is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Ghosten-Player is written in Dart under AGPL-3.0. Nuclear has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Ghosten-Player 6%. Nuclear was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Nuclear ★ 18K Ghosten-Player ★ 3.3K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Nuclear Ghosten-Player
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 3.3K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Dart
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 201
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Nuclear if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Nuclear profile →

pick Ghosten-Player if

  • You want the Ghosten-Player feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You evaluated both and Ghosten-Player fits your workflow better

full Ghosten-Player profile →

About Nuclear

Nuclear is a free, open source music player for Windows, macOS, and Linux that streams music from multiple sources without ads or tracking. The project lives in the desktop music player ecosystem and is written primarily in TypeScript, with a Tauri application built from Rust and React. It is distributed under the AGPL 3.0 license.

read the full Nuclear overview →

About Ghosten-Player

Ghosten Player is a Flutter based video player for Android phone, pad, and TV, with Windows and macOS support in development. It is a Dart app under AGPL 3.0 in the Android media and streaming ecosystem. The project gathers video resources into a local private media library instead of requiring a hosted backend.

read the full Ghosten-Player overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Nuclear vs Jellyfin Nuclear vs Invidious Nuclear vs Navidrome Nuclear vs neko Nuclear vs Kodi Nuclear vs PeerTube Nuclear vs iptv-sources Nuclear vs ansible-nas Nuclear vs Anthias Nuclear vs tvheadend Nuclear vs BookWyrm Nuclear vs mytv-android

Frequently asked questions

Is Nuclear or Ghosten-Player more popular?

Nuclear has 18,480 GitHub stars and Ghosten-Player has 3,299. Nuclear has the larger community by that measure.

Are Nuclear and Ghosten-Player free?

Both are open source. Nuclear is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Ghosten-Player under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Nuclear and Ghosten-Player?

Nuclear is written in TypeScript and Ghosten-Player in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Nuclear or Ghosten-Player?

Choose Nuclear if you want the larger community (18,480 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Ghosten-Player if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.