head to head · open source

tvheadend vs Ghosten-Player

tvheadend has 3,524 GitHub stars, 975 forks, 107 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Ghosten-Player has 3,299 stars, 201 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. tvheadend leads on adoption by 7% (3,524 vs 3,299 stars). tvheadend is written in C under GPL-3.0; Ghosten-Player is written in Dart under AGPL-3.0. tvheadend has attracted 28% as many forks as stars, Ghosten-Player 6%. Ghosten-Player was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (iptv), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

tvheadend ★ 3.5K Ghosten-Player ★ 3.3K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

tvheadend Ghosten-Player
GitHub stars ★ 3.5K ★ 3.3K
License GPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in C Dart
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 975 ⑂ 201
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick tvheadend if

  • You weight community size — 3.5K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full tvheadend profile →

pick Ghosten-Player if

  • You want the Ghosten-Player feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You evaluated both and Ghosten-Player fits your workflow better

full Ghosten-Player profile →

About tvheadend

Tvheadend is an open source TV streaming server and digital video recorder for Linux. It lives in the Linux media and streaming ecosystem, and it is written in C under the GPL 3.0 license. The project provides a server that can receive television signals and streams from many input types, then make those channels available over the network.

read the full tvheadend overview →

About Ghosten-Player

Ghosten Player is a Flutter based video player for Android phone, pad, and TV, with Windows and macOS support in development. It is a Dart app under AGPL 3.0 in the Android media and streaming ecosystem. The project gathers video resources into a local private media library instead of requiring a hosted backend.

read the full Ghosten-Player overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

tvheadend vs Jellyfin tvheadend vs Invidious tvheadend vs Navidrome tvheadend vs neko tvheadend vs Kodi tvheadend vs Nuclear tvheadend vs PeerTube tvheadend vs iptv-sources tvheadend vs ansible-nas tvheadend vs Anthias tvheadend vs BookWyrm tvheadend vs mytv-android

Frequently asked questions

Is tvheadend or Ghosten-Player more popular?

tvheadend has 3,524 GitHub stars and Ghosten-Player has 3,299. tvheadend has the larger community by that measure.

Are tvheadend and Ghosten-Player free?

Both are open source. tvheadend is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Ghosten-Player under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between tvheadend and Ghosten-Player?

tvheadend is written in C and Ghosten-Player in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, tvheadend or Ghosten-Player?

Choose tvheadend if you want the larger community (3,524 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Ghosten-Player if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.