head to head · open source

Invidious vs Ghosten-Player

Invidious has 24,555 GitHub stars, 2,761 forks, 480 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Ghosten-Player has 3,299 stars, 201 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Invidious leads on adoption by 644% (24,555 vs 3,299 stars). Invidious is written in Crystal under AGPL-3.0; Ghosten-Player is written in Dart under AGPL-3.0. Invidious has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Ghosten-Player 6%. Invidious was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Invidious ★ 25K Ghosten-Player ★ 3.3K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Invidious Ghosten-Player
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 3.3K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Crystal Dart
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 201
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Invidious if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Crystal
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Invidious profile →

pick Ghosten-Player if

  • You want the Ghosten-Player feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You evaluated both and Ghosten-Player fits your workflow better

full Ghosten-Player profile →

About Invidious

Invidious is an open source, AGPL 3.0 alternative front end to YouTube, written in Crystal, aimed at people who want to watch videos without ads, tracking, or a Google account.

read the full Invidious overview →

About Ghosten-Player

Ghosten Player is a Flutter based video player for Android phone, pad, and TV, with Windows and macOS support in development. It is a Dart app under AGPL 3.0 in the Android media and streaming ecosystem. The project gathers video resources into a local private media library instead of requiring a hosted backend.

read the full Ghosten-Player overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Invidious vs Jellyfin Invidious vs Navidrome Invidious vs neko Invidious vs Kodi Invidious vs Nuclear Invidious vs PeerTube Invidious vs iptv-sources Invidious vs ansible-nas Invidious vs Anthias Invidious vs tvheadend Invidious vs BookWyrm Invidious vs mytv-android

Frequently asked questions

Is Invidious or Ghosten-Player more popular?

Invidious has 24,555 GitHub stars and Ghosten-Player has 3,299. Invidious has the larger community by that measure.

Are Invidious and Ghosten-Player free?

Both are open source. Invidious is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Ghosten-Player under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Invidious and Ghosten-Player?

Invidious is written in Crystal and Ghosten-Player in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Invidious or Ghosten-Player?

Choose Invidious if you want the larger community (24,555 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Ghosten-Player if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.