head to head · open source

ansible-nas vs Ghosten-Player

ansible-nas has 3,780 GitHub stars, 513 forks, 102 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. Ghosten-Player has 3,299 stars, 201 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. ansible-nas leads on adoption by 15% (3,780 vs 3,299 stars). ansible-nas is written in Jinja under MIT; Ghosten-Player is written in Dart under AGPL-3.0. ansible-nas has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, Ghosten-Player 6%. Ghosten-Player was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ansible-nas ★ 3.8K Ghosten-Player ★ 3.3K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ansible-nas Ghosten-Player
GitHub stars ★ 3.8K ★ 3.3K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Jinja Dart
Last push 2026-02-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 513 ⑂ 201
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ansible-nas if

  • You weight community size — 3.8K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Jinja
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ansible-nas profile →

pick Ghosten-Player if

  • You want the Ghosten-Player feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You evaluated both and Ghosten-Player fits your workflow better

full Ghosten-Player profile →

About ansible-nas

Ansible NAS is an open source Ansible playbook for building a home server or network attached storage replacement on a stock Ubuntu system. It lives in the self hosted homelab ecosystem, where users combine Ansible automation, Docker containers, and Ubuntu Server to run personal services on hardware they own.

read the full ansible-nas overview →

About Ghosten-Player

Ghosten Player is a Flutter based video player for Android phone, pad, and TV, with Windows and macOS support in development. It is a Dart app under AGPL 3.0 in the Android media and streaming ecosystem. The project gathers video resources into a local private media library instead of requiring a hosted backend.

read the full Ghosten-Player overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs ansible-nas jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

ansible-nas vs Jellyfin ansible-nas vs Invidious ansible-nas vs Navidrome ansible-nas vs neko ansible-nas vs Kodi ansible-nas vs Nuclear ansible-nas vs PeerTube ansible-nas vs iptv-sources ansible-nas vs Anthias ansible-nas vs tvheadend ansible-nas vs BookWyrm ansible-nas vs mytv-android

Frequently asked questions

Is ansible-nas or Ghosten-Player more popular?

ansible-nas has 3,780 GitHub stars and Ghosten-Player has 3,299. ansible-nas has the larger community by that measure.

Are ansible-nas and Ghosten-Player free?

Both are open source. ansible-nas is licensed under MIT and Ghosten-Player under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ansible-nas and Ghosten-Player?

ansible-nas is written in Jinja and Ghosten-Player in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ansible-nas or Ghosten-Player?

Choose ansible-nas if you want the larger community (3,780 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Ghosten-Player if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.