head to head · open source

Jellyfin vs Ghosten-Player

Jellyfin has 57,309 GitHub stars, 5,529 forks, 684 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Ghosten-Player has 3,299 stars, 201 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Jellyfin leads on adoption by 1,637% (57,309 vs 3,299 stars). Jellyfin is written in C# under GPL-2.0; Ghosten-Player is written in Dart under AGPL-3.0. Jellyfin has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Ghosten-Player 6%. Jellyfin was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (jellyfin), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Jellyfin ★ 57K Ghosten-Player ★ 3.3K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Jellyfin Ghosten-Player
GitHub stars ★ 57K ★ 3.3K
License GPL-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in C# Dart
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.5K ⑂ 201
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Jellyfin if

  • You weight community size — 57K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Jellyfin profile →

pick Ghosten-Player if

  • You want the Ghosten-Player feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You evaluated both and Ghosten-Player fits your workflow better

full Ghosten-Player profile →

About Jellyfin

Jellyfin is a free and open source media server that lets an individual or an organisation manage and stream their own movies, music, and other media from a dedicated server to end user devices through multiple client apps.

read the full Jellyfin overview →

About Ghosten-Player

Ghosten Player is a Flutter based video player for Android phone, pad, and TV, with Windows and macOS support in development. It is a Dart app under AGPL 3.0 in the Android media and streaming ecosystem. The project gathers video resources into a local private media library instead of requiring a hosted backend.

read the full Ghosten-Player overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Jellyfin vs Invidious Jellyfin vs Navidrome Jellyfin vs neko Jellyfin vs Kodi Jellyfin vs Nuclear Jellyfin vs PeerTube Jellyfin vs iptv-sources Jellyfin vs ansible-nas Jellyfin vs Anthias Jellyfin vs tvheadend Jellyfin vs BookWyrm Jellyfin vs mytv-android

Frequently asked questions

Is Jellyfin or Ghosten-Player more popular?

Jellyfin has 57,309 GitHub stars and Ghosten-Player has 3,299. Jellyfin has the larger community by that measure.

Are Jellyfin and Ghosten-Player free?

Both are open source. Jellyfin is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Ghosten-Player under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Jellyfin and Ghosten-Player?

Jellyfin is written in C# and Ghosten-Player in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Jellyfin or Ghosten-Player?

Choose Jellyfin if you want the larger community (57,309 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose Ghosten-Player if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.