head to head · open source

Jellyfin vs Nuclear

Jellyfin has 57,244 GitHub stars, 5,523 forks, 684 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Nuclear has 18,468 stars, 1,327 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Jellyfin leads on adoption by 210% (57,244 vs 18,468 stars). Jellyfin is written in C# under GPL-2.0; Nuclear is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Jellyfin has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Nuclear 7%. Jellyfin was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Jellyfin ★ 57K Nuclear ★ 18K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Jellyfin Nuclear
GitHub stars ★ 57K ★ 18K
License GPL-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in C# TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 5.5K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Jellyfin if

  • You weight community size — 57K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Jellyfin profile →

pick Nuclear if

  • You want the Nuclear feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Nuclear fits your workflow better

full Nuclear profile →

About Jellyfin

Jellyfin is a free and open source media server that lets an individual or an organisation manage and stream their own movies, music, and other media from a dedicated server to end user devices through multiple client apps.

read the full Jellyfin overview →

About Nuclear

Nuclear is a free, open source music player for Windows, macOS, and Linux that streams music from multiple sources without ads or tracking. The project lives in the desktop music player ecosystem and is written primarily in TypeScript, with a Tauri application built from Rust and React. It is distributed under the AGPL 3.0 license.

read the full Nuclear overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenCut ★ 90K OpenBB ★ 73K LosslessCut ★ 44K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb firecrawl vs novu

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Jellyfin vs Invidious Jellyfin vs Navidrome Jellyfin vs neko Jellyfin vs Kodi Jellyfin vs PeerTube Jellyfin vs iptv-sources Jellyfin vs ansible-nas Jellyfin vs Anthias Jellyfin vs tvheadend Jellyfin vs Ghosten-Player Jellyfin vs BookWyrm Jellyfin vs mytv-android

Frequently asked questions

Is Jellyfin or Nuclear more popular?

Jellyfin has 57,244 GitHub stars and Nuclear has 18,468. Jellyfin has the larger community by that measure.

Are Jellyfin and Nuclear free?

Both are open source. Jellyfin is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Nuclear under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Jellyfin and Nuclear?

Jellyfin is written in C# and Nuclear in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Jellyfin or Nuclear?

Choose Jellyfin if you want the larger community (57,244 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose Nuclear if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.