head to head · open source
neko vs Ghosten-Player
neko has 22,334 GitHub stars, 1,628 forks, 151 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. Ghosten-Player has 3,299 stars, 201 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. neko leads on adoption by 577% (22,334 vs 3,299 stars). neko is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Ghosten-Player is written in Dart under AGPL-3.0. neko has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Ghosten-Player 6%. Ghosten-Player was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| neko | Ghosten-Player | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 22K | ★ 3.3K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | Dart |
| Last push | 2026-09-10 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.6K | ⑂ 201 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick neko if
- You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Ghosten-Player if
- You want the Ghosten-Player feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Dart
- You evaluated both and Ghosten-Player fits your workflow better
About neko
Neko is a self hosted virtual browser that runs inside a Docker container and streams its desktop to several people at once over WebRTC, built for developers testing web applications, privacy conscious users, and teams who want to browse, watch or present together in one shared session.
About Ghosten-Player
Ghosten Player is a Flutter based video player for Android phone, pad, and TV, with Windows and macOS support in development. It is a Dart app under AGPL 3.0 in the Android media and streaming ecosystem. The project gathers video resources into a local private media library instead of requiring a hosted backend.
read the full Ghosten-Player overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Media & Streaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is neko or Ghosten-Player more popular?
neko has 22,334 GitHub stars and Ghosten-Player has 3,299. neko has the larger community by that measure.
Are neko and Ghosten-Player free?
Both are open source. neko is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Ghosten-Player under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between neko and Ghosten-Player?
neko is written in Go and Ghosten-Player in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, neko or Ghosten-Player?
Choose neko if you want the larger community (22,334 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Ghosten-Player if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.