head to head · open source

Ghosten-Player vs ffmpeg-webCLI

Ghosten-Player has 3,392 GitHub stars, 211 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. ffmpeg-webCLI has 1,464 stars, 143 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. Ghosten-Player leads on adoption by 132% (3,392 vs 1,464 stars). Ghosten-Player is written in Dart under AGPL-3.0; ffmpeg-webCLI is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0. Ghosten-Player has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, ffmpeg-webCLI 10%. Ghosten-Player was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ghosten-Player ★ 3.4K ffmpeg-webCLI ★ 1.5K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ghosten-Player ffmpeg-webCLI
GitHub stars ★ 3.4K ★ 1.5K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Dart JavaScript
Last push 2026-11-01 2026-10-27
Forks ⑂ 211 ⑂ 143
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ghosten-Player if

  • You weight community size — 3.4K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ghosten-Player profile →

pick ffmpeg-webCLI if

  • You want the ffmpeg-webCLI feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and ffmpeg-webCLI fits your workflow better

full ffmpeg-webCLI profile →

About Ghosten-Player

中文 English Ghosten Player 是一款同时适配 📱 Android Phone 和 📺 Android TV 的视频播放器(未来将支持 Windows 和 macOS)。整合影视资源,自动刮削媒体信息,支持IPTV播放,优雅打造私人影视库。 界面简洁,功能丰富,开箱即用。 如果项目对您有帮助,就请给颗🌟Star吧。 项目处于用爱发电阶段,请考虑赞助支持项目持续维护。您的支持是我维护的最大动力(′・ω・ ) Features 自动刮削媒体信息 themoviedb nfo 客户端 Android Phone 和 Android Pad Android TV Windows (开发中) Macos (开发中) 网盘支持 支持阿里云盘、夸克网盘、Webdav和本地媒体文件 支持Emby和Jellyfin 清晰度切换(阿里云盘) 多账号登录 网盘文件查看和管理 文件下载和边下边播 多线程网络加速 IPTV 线路切换 自动分组 节目时间表EPG 播放器 手势操作(双击播放/暂停/快进/快退,音量/亮度调节,画面缩放,拖动快进,长按倍速等) 跳过片头/片尾 播放内嵌字幕和外置字幕[^2] 倍速播放 视频轨道选择 DLNA投屏 自定义字幕样式 UI 中英双语 浅色和深色模式 支持手机端辅助TV端输入 自定义界面大小 TV端自定义按键 其他 纯本地运行,无需后端服务支持 [^1] 软件体积小 (≈ 15…

read the full Ghosten-Player overview →

About ffmpeg-webCLI

ffmpeg webCLI A browser based video editor powered by ffmpeg.wasm. No uploads, no servers all processing happens locally in your browser using WebAssembly. ▶ Live app: Paper This tool is a reference implementation of the Web CLI architecture, described in: The Web CLI: Verifiable Privacy for Tools, Models, and Inference Engines in the Browser Tejaswi Gowda, Arizona State University. arXiv: The paper defines the four properties (fidelity, progressive disclosure, offline first, zero egress), presents four reference implementations, and argues that for sensitive data, client side should be the default architecture…

read the full ffmpeg-webCLI overview →

More in Miscellaneous

Related comparisons

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Ghosten-Player or ffmpeg-webCLI more popular?

Ghosten-Player has 3,392 GitHub stars and ffmpeg-webCLI has 1,464. Ghosten-Player has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ghosten-Player and ffmpeg-webCLI free?

Both are open source. Ghosten-Player is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and ffmpeg-webCLI under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Ghosten-Player and ffmpeg-webCLI?

Ghosten-Player is written in Dart and ffmpeg-webCLI in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ghosten-Player or ffmpeg-webCLI?

Choose Ghosten-Player if you want the larger community (3,392 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose ffmpeg-webCLI if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.