head to head · open source

filepond vs Shotcut

filepond has 16,393 GitHub stars, 848 forks, 142 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Shotcut has 15,242 stars, 1,510 forks, 52 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. filepond leads on adoption by 8% (16,393 vs 15,242 stars). filepond is written in JavaScript under MIT; Shotcut is written in C++ under GPL-3.0. filepond has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Shotcut 10%. Shotcut was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

filepond ★ 16K Shotcut ★ 15K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

filepond Shotcut
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 15K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript C++
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 848 ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick filepond if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full filepond profile →

pick Shotcut if

  • You want the Shotcut feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and Shotcut fits your workflow better

full Shotcut profile →

About filepond

FilePond is an MIT licensed JavaScript file upload library for front end developers who need drag and drop, clipboard paste, API driven uploads, and automatic image optimization in one dependency.

read the full filepond overview →

About Shotcut

Shotcut is a free, open source, cross platform video editor written in C++ and released under the GPL 3.0 license. It lives in the Qt and MLT ecosystem, using Qt for its application and user interface and MLT as its multimedia authoring framework. It provides regularly built binaries for Linux, macOS, and Windows, and is positioned as an open alternative to Adobe Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve (Studio).

read the full Shotcut overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

filepond vs OpenCut filepond vs LosslessCut filepond vs sharp filepond vs rembg filepond vs Audacity filepond vs ImageToolbox filepond vs palmier-pro filepond vs Darktable filepond vs libvips filepond vs imgproxy filepond vs Krita filepond vs TagStudio

Frequently asked questions

Is filepond or Shotcut more popular?

filepond has 16,393 GitHub stars and Shotcut has 15,242. filepond has the larger community by that measure.

Are filepond and Shotcut free?

Both are open source. filepond is licensed under MIT and Shotcut under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between filepond and Shotcut?

filepond is written in JavaScript and Shotcut in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, filepond or Shotcut?

Choose filepond if you want the larger community (16,393 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Shotcut if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.