head to head · open source

Audacity vs filepond

Audacity has 18,493 GitHub stars, 2,667 forks, 1,781 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. filepond has 16,393 stars, 848 forks, 142 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Audacity leads on adoption by 13% (18,493 vs 16,393 stars). Audacity is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence; filepond is written in JavaScript under MIT. Audacity has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, filepond 5%. Audacity was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Audacity ★ 18K filepond ★ 16K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Audacity filepond
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 16K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in C++ JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 848
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Audacity if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Audacity profile →

pick filepond if

  • You want the filepond feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and filepond fits your workflow better

full filepond profile →

About Audacity

Audacity is an open source audio editor and recorder written in C++ and distributed under free software terms. It lives in the open source desktop audio editing ecosystem, where it provides a multi track interface for recording and editing audio on Windows, macOS, GNU/Linux, and other operating systems. The README describes the project as an easy to use audio tool, and the repository contains both the Audacity 3.x line and the in progress Audacity 4 line.

read the full Audacity overview →

About filepond

FilePond is an MIT licensed JavaScript file upload library for front end developers who need drag and drop, clipboard paste, API driven uploads, and automatic image optimization in one dependency.

read the full filepond overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

Audacity vs OpenCut Audacity vs LosslessCut Audacity vs sharp Audacity vs rembg Audacity vs Shotcut Audacity vs ImageToolbox Audacity vs palmier-pro Audacity vs Darktable Audacity vs libvips Audacity vs imgproxy Audacity vs Krita Audacity vs TagStudio

Frequently asked questions

Is Audacity or filepond more popular?

Audacity has 18,493 GitHub stars and filepond has 16,393. Audacity has the larger community by that measure.

Are Audacity and filepond free?

Both are open source. Audacity has no licence declared in this registry, and filepond is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Audacity and filepond?

Audacity is written in C++ and filepond in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Audacity or filepond?

Choose Audacity if you want the larger community (18,493 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose filepond if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.