head to head · open source
filepond vs Concat
filepond has 16,392 GitHub stars, 851 forks, 142 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Concat has 13,787 stars, 1,701 forks, 44 open issues and last shipped yesterday. filepond leads on adoption by 19% (16,392 vs 13,787 stars). filepond is written in JavaScript under MIT; Concat is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. filepond has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Concat 12%. Concat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| filepond | Concat | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 16K | ★ 14K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-10-28 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 851 | ⑂ 1.7K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick filepond if
- You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Concat if
- You want the Concat feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and Concat fits your workflow better
About filepond
A JavaScript library that can upload anything you throw at it, optimizes images for faster uploads, and offers a great, accessible, silky smooth user experience. FilePond adapters are available for React , Vue , Angular , Svelte , and jQuery FilePond v5 Alpha version now available for testing Documentation • Discord • Examples Buy me a Coffee • Use FilePond with Pintura • Dev updates Core Features Accepts directories , files , blobs, local URLs, remote URLs and Data URIs. Drop files , select on filesystem, copy and paste files , or add files using the API. Async uploads with AJAX, supports chunk uploads , can…
read the full filepond overview →
About Concat
Concat The truly free, and open source cross platform CapCut replacement. Your logo here Sponsor Concat and your name, logo and link take this slot Your logo here Sponsor Concat and your name, logo and link take this slot Your logo here Sponsor Concat and your name, logo and link take this slot Your logo here Sponsor Concat and your name, logo and link take this slot Your logo here Sponsor Concat and your name, logo and link take this slot Your logo here Sponsor Concat and your name, logo and link take this slot About Concat is a free, open source video editor and a CapCut alternative for macOS, Windows, Linux…
read the full Concat overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Photo & Video Editors projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.
Frequently asked questions
Is filepond or Concat more popular?
filepond has 16,392 GitHub stars and Concat has 13,787. filepond has the larger community by that measure.
Are filepond and Concat free?
Both are open source. filepond is licensed under MIT and Concat under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between filepond and Concat?
filepond is written in JavaScript and Concat in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, filepond or Concat?
Choose filepond if you want the larger community (16,392 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Concat if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.