head to head · open source

LosslessCut vs pymatting

LosslessCut has 44,446 GitHub stars, 2,209 forks, 300 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. pymatting has 1,921 stars, 227 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. LosslessCut leads on adoption by 2,214% (44,446 vs 1,921 stars). LosslessCut is written in TypeScript under GPL-2.0; pymatting is written in Python under MIT. LosslessCut has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, pymatting 12%. LosslessCut was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LosslessCut ★ 44K pymatting ★ 1.9K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

LosslessCut pymatting
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 1.9K
License GPL-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-30 2026-09-08
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 227
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LosslessCut if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LosslessCut profile →

pick pymatting if

  • You want the pymatting feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and pymatting fits your workflow better

full pymatting profile →

About LosslessCut

LosslessCut is a cross platform desktop application for lossless editing of video, audio, and subtitle files. Built with Electron and TypeScript, it serves as a graphical interface to FFmpeg, enabling users to perform precise cuts, trims, merges, and track manipulations without re encoding, thus preserving original quality. It targets users who need to rapidly process media files—such as raw footage from cameras, drones, or smartphones—where re encoding would be time consuming and degrade fidelity.

read the full LosslessCut overview →

About pymatting

PyMatting is a Python library for alpha matting that lets developers and researchers estimate a foreground object's alpha channel from an image and a hand drawn trimap.

read the full pymatting overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 190K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K open-design ★ 100K ant-design ★ 100K manim ★ 95K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

LosslessCut vs OpenCut LosslessCut vs sharp LosslessCut vs rembg LosslessCut vs Audacity LosslessCut vs filepond LosslessCut vs Shotcut LosslessCut vs ImageToolbox LosslessCut vs palmier-pro LosslessCut vs Darktable LosslessCut vs libvips LosslessCut vs imgproxy LosslessCut vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is LosslessCut or pymatting more popular?

LosslessCut has 44,446 GitHub stars and pymatting has 1,921. LosslessCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are LosslessCut and pymatting free?

Both are open source. LosslessCut is licensed under GPL-2.0 and pymatting under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LosslessCut and pymatting?

LosslessCut is written in TypeScript and pymatting in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LosslessCut or pymatting?

Choose LosslessCut if you want the larger community (44,446 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose pymatting if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.