head to head · open source
LosslessCut vs FableCut
LosslessCut has 45,969 GitHub stars, 2,327 forks, 300 open issues and last shipped yesterday. FableCut has 791 stars, 104 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. LosslessCut leads on adoption by 5,712% (45,969 vs 791 stars). LosslessCut is written in TypeScript under GPL-2.0; FableCut is written in JavaScript under MIT. LosslessCut has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, FableCut 13%. LosslessCut was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ffmpeg, video-editor), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LosslessCut | FableCut | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 46K | ★ 791 |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-12 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.3K | ⑂ 104 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LosslessCut if
- You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick FableCut if
- You want the FableCut feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and FableCut fits your workflow better
About LosslessCut
LosslessCut The swiss army knife of lossless video/audio editing Thanks to my supporters and everyone who purchased LosslessCut! LosslessCut aims to be the ultimate cross platform FFmpeg GUI for extremely fast and lossless operations on video, audio, subtitle and other related media files. The main feature is lossless trimming and cutting of video and audio files, which is great for saving space by rough cutting your large video files taken from a video camera, GoPro, drone, etc. It lets you quickly extract the good parts from your videos and discard many gigabytes of data without doing a slow re encode and…
read the full LosslessCut overview →
About FableCut
A browser video editor that AI agents can drive. English · 简体中文 · 日本語 · Español · Português (BR) FableCut is a Premiere style non linear video editor that runs entirely in your browser — and exposes its whole timeline as one JSON document. Edit it by hand, from the UI, or let an AI agent (Claude Code, Claude Desktop, or anything that speaks MCP/REST) cut your video for you while you watch the timeline update live. Zero npm dependencies. One node server.js . That's it. Why it's interesting Most "AI video" tools hide the edit behind an API. FableCut flips that: the project file is the interface . project.json…
read the full FableCut overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Photo & Video Editors projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LosslessCut or FableCut more popular?
LosslessCut has 45,969 GitHub stars and FableCut has 791. LosslessCut has the larger community by that measure.
Are LosslessCut and FableCut free?
Both are open source. LosslessCut is licensed under GPL-2.0 and FableCut under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between LosslessCut and FableCut?
LosslessCut is written in TypeScript and FableCut in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LosslessCut or FableCut?
Choose LosslessCut if you want the larger community (45,969 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose FableCut if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.