head to head · open source

LosslessCut vs FableCut

LosslessCut has 44,107 GitHub stars, 2,189 forks, 300 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. FableCut has 694 stars, 73 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. LosslessCut leads on adoption by 6,255% (44,107 vs 694 stars). LosslessCut is written in TypeScript under GPL-2.0; FableCut is written in JavaScript under MIT. LosslessCut has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, FableCut 11%. FableCut was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ffmpeg, video-editor), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LosslessCut ★ 44K FableCut ★ 694 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

LosslessCut FableCut
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 694
License GPL-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-23 2026-09-25
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 73
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LosslessCut if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LosslessCut profile →

pick FableCut if

  • You want the FableCut feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and FableCut fits your workflow better

full FableCut profile →

About LosslessCut

LosslessCut is a cross platform desktop application for lossless editing of video, audio, and subtitle files. Built with Electron and TypeScript, it serves as a graphical interface to FFmpeg, enabling users to perform precise cuts, trims, merges, and track manipulations without re encoding, thus preserving original quality. It targets users who need to rapidly process media files—such as raw footage from cameras, drones, or smartphones—where re encoding would be time consuming and degrade fidelity.

read the full LosslessCut overview →

About FableCut

FableCut is a zero dependency, MIT licensed browser video editor that runs as a Premiere style non linear editor in the browser and exposes its entire timeline as a single JSON document that AI agents can edit over MCP or REST.

read the full FableCut overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 186K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

LosslessCut vs OpenCut LosslessCut vs sharp LosslessCut vs rembg LosslessCut vs Audacity LosslessCut vs filepond LosslessCut vs Shotcut LosslessCut vs ImageToolbox LosslessCut vs palmier-pro LosslessCut vs Darktable LosslessCut vs libvips LosslessCut vs imgproxy LosslessCut vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is LosslessCut or FableCut more popular?

LosslessCut has 44,107 GitHub stars and FableCut has 694. LosslessCut has the larger community by that measure.

Are LosslessCut and FableCut free?

Both are open source. LosslessCut is licensed under GPL-2.0 and FableCut under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LosslessCut and FableCut?

LosslessCut is written in TypeScript and FableCut in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LosslessCut or FableCut?

Choose LosslessCut if you want the larger community (44,107 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose FableCut if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.