head to head · open source

filepond vs Darktable

filepond has 16,393 GitHub stars, 848 forks, 142 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Darktable has 13,106 stars, 1,434 forks, 678 open issues and last shipped today. filepond leads on adoption by 25% (16,393 vs 13,106 stars). filepond is written in JavaScript under MIT; Darktable is written in C under GPL-3.0. filepond has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Darktable 11%. Darktable was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

filepond ★ 16K Darktable ★ 13K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

filepond Darktable
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 13K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript C
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 848 ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick filepond if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full filepond profile →

pick Darktable if

  • You want the Darktable feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and Darktable fits your workflow better

full Darktable profile →

About filepond

FilePond is an MIT licensed JavaScript file upload library for front end developers who need drag and drop, clipboard paste, API driven uploads, and automatic image optimization in one dependency.

read the full filepond overview →

About Darktable

Darktable is an open source photography workflow application and non destructive raw developer. It acts as a virtual lighttable and darkroom for photographers, and it lives in the open source photography ecosystem as a C project licensed under the GPL 3.0. It manages digital negatives in a database, lets a user view them through a zoomable lighttable, and supports raw development, enhancement, and export to local or remote storage.

read the full Darktable overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs filepond opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

filepond vs OpenCut filepond vs LosslessCut filepond vs sharp filepond vs rembg filepond vs Audacity filepond vs Shotcut filepond vs ImageToolbox filepond vs palmier-pro filepond vs libvips filepond vs imgproxy filepond vs Krita filepond vs TagStudio

Frequently asked questions

Is filepond or Darktable more popular?

filepond has 16,393 GitHub stars and Darktable has 13,106. filepond has the larger community by that measure.

Are filepond and Darktable free?

Both are open source. filepond is licensed under MIT and Darktable under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between filepond and Darktable?

filepond is written in JavaScript and Darktable in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, filepond or Darktable?

Choose filepond if you want the larger community (16,393 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Darktable if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.