head to head · open source

filepond vs libvips

filepond has 16,393 GitHub stars, 848 forks, 142 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. libvips has 11,656 stars, 797 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped yesterday. filepond leads on adoption by 41% (16,393 vs 11,656 stars). filepond is written in JavaScript under MIT; libvips is written in C under LGPL-2.1. filepond has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, libvips 7%. libvips was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (image-processing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

filepond ★ 16K libvips ★ 12K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

filepond libvips
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 12K
License MIT LGPL-2.1
Written in JavaScript C
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 848 ⑂ 797
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick filepond if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full filepond profile →

pick libvips if

  • You want the libvips feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the LGPL-2.1 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and libvips fits your workflow better

full libvips profile →

About filepond

FilePond is an MIT licensed JavaScript file upload library for front end developers who need drag and drop, clipboard paste, API driven uploads, and automatic image optimization in one dependency.

read the full filepond overview →

About libvips

libvips is a demand driven, horizontally threaded image processing library in C, licensed LGPL 2.1 or later, for developers who need to resize, convert and analyse large images quickly without exhausting memory.

read the full libvips overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs filepond opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

filepond vs OpenCut filepond vs LosslessCut filepond vs sharp filepond vs rembg filepond vs Audacity filepond vs Shotcut filepond vs ImageToolbox filepond vs palmier-pro filepond vs Darktable filepond vs imgproxy filepond vs Krita filepond vs TagStudio

Frequently asked questions

Is filepond or libvips more popular?

filepond has 16,393 GitHub stars and libvips has 11,656. filepond has the larger community by that measure.

Are filepond and libvips free?

Both are open source. filepond is licensed under MIT and libvips under LGPL-2.1. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between filepond and libvips?

filepond is written in JavaScript and libvips in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, filepond or libvips?

Choose filepond if you want the larger community (16,393 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose libvips if its feature set, stack or LGPL-2.1 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.