head to head · open source
filepond vs imgproxy
filepond has 16,393 GitHub stars, 848 forks, 142 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. imgproxy has 11,080 stars, 776 forks, 67 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. filepond leads on adoption by 48% (16,393 vs 11,080 stars). filepond is written in JavaScript under MIT; imgproxy is written in Go under Apache-2.0. filepond has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, imgproxy 7%. imgproxy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (image-processing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| filepond | imgproxy | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 16K | ★ 11K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 848 | ⑂ 776 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick filepond if
- You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick imgproxy if
- You want the imgproxy feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and imgproxy fits your workflow better
About filepond
FilePond is an MIT licensed JavaScript file upload library for front end developers who need drag and drop, clipboard paste, API driven uploads, and automatic image optimization in one dependency.
read the full filepond overview →
About imgproxy
imgproxy is a fast, secure standalone HTTP server, written in Go and released under the Apache 2.0 licence, that resizes, processes, and converts images on the fly for web developers, platform engineers, and teams that want image processing to live in a dedicated service instead of inside their applications.
read the full imgproxy overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Photo & Video Editors projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.
Frequently asked questions
Is filepond or imgproxy more popular?
filepond has 16,393 GitHub stars and imgproxy has 11,080. filepond has the larger community by that measure.
Are filepond and imgproxy free?
Both are open source. filepond is licensed under MIT and imgproxy under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between filepond and imgproxy?
filepond is written in JavaScript and imgproxy in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, filepond or imgproxy?
Choose filepond if you want the larger community (16,393 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose imgproxy if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.