head to head · open source
AutoMQ vs Timeplus
AutoMQ has 10,775 GitHub stars, 771 forks, 60 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Timeplus has 2,260 stars, 112 forks, 77 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AutoMQ leads on adoption by 377% (10,775 vs 2,260 stars). AutoMQ is written in Java under Apache-2.0; Timeplus is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. AutoMQ has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Timeplus 5%. AutoMQ was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| AutoMQ | Timeplus | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 11K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Java | C++ |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 771 | ⑂ 112 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick AutoMQ if
- You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Timeplus if
- You want the Timeplus feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You evaluated both and Timeplus fits your workflow better
About AutoMQ
AutoMQ is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Java based diskless distribution of Kafka that keeps stream data on S3 instead of broker local disks, aimed at platform and infrastructure teams running event streaming at cloud scale.
read the full AutoMQ overview →
About Timeplus
Timeplus Proton is an open source stream processing engine written in C++ and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It is presented as a single binary SQL pipeline engine for real time analytics, observability, ETL, and AI context. It lives in the messaging and event streaming ecosystem, with topic links to Kafka, ClickHouse, Flink, ksqlDB, Iceberg, and observability.
read the full Timeplus overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Messaging & Event Streaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is AutoMQ or Timeplus more popular?
AutoMQ has 10,775 GitHub stars and Timeplus has 2,260. AutoMQ has the larger community by that measure.
Are AutoMQ and Timeplus free?
Both are open source. AutoMQ is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Timeplus under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between AutoMQ and Timeplus?
AutoMQ is written in Java and Timeplus in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, AutoMQ or Timeplus?
Choose AutoMQ if you want the larger community (10,775 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Timeplus if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.