head to head · open source
AutoMQ vs Timeplus
AutoMQ has 10,920 GitHub stars, 800 forks, 60 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Timeplus has 2,280 stars, 112 forks, 77 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. AutoMQ leads on adoption by 379% (10,920 vs 2,280 stars). AutoMQ is written in Java under Apache-2.0; Timeplus is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. AutoMQ has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Timeplus 5%. AutoMQ was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| AutoMQ | Timeplus | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 11K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Java | C++ |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 800 | ⑂ 112 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick AutoMQ if
- You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Timeplus if
- You want the Timeplus feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You evaluated both and Timeplus fits your workflow better
About AutoMQ
Diskless Kafka® on S3, Offering 10x Cost Savings and Scaling in Seconds. 📑  Documentation     🔥  Explore AutoMQ Playground Now     yellow) orange) From 6 Hours to Seconds: How Grab Achieved 3x Data Streaming Efficiency with AutoMQ Tencent Cloud EMR uses AutoMQ as a first party service 2.2B Messages a Day: LG U+ Modernizes Log Pipelines with AutoMQ on AWS Geely: Powering Hybrid Cloud Streaming for a 10 Million Vehicle Fleet Bambu Lab: Unifying Multi Cloud Data Streaming with Stateless Kafka Honda: Slashing Kafka TCO by 50% with Cloud Native Diskless Architecture Avia Games…
read the full AutoMQ overview →
About Timeplus
Fastest SQL pipeline engine for stream processing, analytics, observability and AI What's Timeplus Proton 🚀 The fastest SQL pipeline engine in a single C++ binary, for stream processing, analytics, observability and AI. A simple, fast and efficient alternative to ksqlDB and Apache Flink, powered by ClickHouse engine. 🔥 SQL for everything : Native source/sink (Kafka, ClickHouse, MySQL, Postgres, MongoDB, S3/Iceberg, OpenSearch etc.), Streaming ingestion, Multi stream JOINs, Incremental Materialized Views, Alerting, Tasks, UDF in Python/JS etc. ⚡ No JVM. No ZooKeeper. Zero dependencies. Just speed, control and…
read the full Timeplus overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Messaging & Event Streaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is AutoMQ or Timeplus more popular?
AutoMQ has 10,920 GitHub stars and Timeplus has 2,280. AutoMQ has the larger community by that measure.
Are AutoMQ and Timeplus free?
Both are open source. AutoMQ is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Timeplus under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between AutoMQ and Timeplus?
AutoMQ is written in Java and Timeplus in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, AutoMQ or Timeplus?
Choose AutoMQ if you want the larger community (10,920 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Timeplus if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.