head to head · open source

AutoMQ vs dino

AutoMQ has 10,789 GitHub stars, 771 forks, 60 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dino has 2,489 stars, 281 forks, 684 open issues and last shipped 29 days ago. AutoMQ leads on adoption by 333% (10,789 vs 2,489 stars). AutoMQ is written in Java under Apache-2.0; dino is written in Vala under GPL-3.0. AutoMQ has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, dino 11%. AutoMQ was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AutoMQ ★ 11K dino ★ 2.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

AutoMQ dino
GitHub stars ★ 11K ★ 2.5K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Java Vala
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-08-21
Forks ⑂ 771 ⑂ 281
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AutoMQ if

  • You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AutoMQ profile →

pick dino if

  • You want the dino feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Vala
  • You evaluated both and dino fits your workflow better

full dino profile →

About AutoMQ

AutoMQ is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Java based diskless distribution of Kafka that keeps stream data on S3 instead of broker local disks, aimed at platform and infrastructure teams running event streaming at cloud scale.

read the full AutoMQ overview →

About dino

Dino is a modern XMPP ("Jabber") chat client for the Linux desktop, built with GTK and Vala, and it is aimed at Linux users who want a native desktop messenger for calls, encryption, file transfers, and group chats on the open XMPP network.

read the full dino overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

automq vs soketi automq vs timeplus automq vs sequin automq vs trench automq vs hook0 automq vs operational automq vs workbench soketi vs timeplus n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

AutoMQ vs kafka AutoMQ vs nats-server AutoMQ vs webrtc AutoMQ vs Soketi AutoMQ vs MadelineProto AutoMQ vs Timeplus AutoMQ vs Sequin AutoMQ vs Trench AutoMQ vs Hook0 AutoMQ vs Operational AutoMQ vs Workbench

Frequently asked questions

Is AutoMQ or dino more popular?

AutoMQ has 10,789 GitHub stars and dino has 2,489. AutoMQ has the larger community by that measure.

Are AutoMQ and dino free?

Both are open source. AutoMQ is licensed under Apache-2.0 and dino under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AutoMQ and dino?

AutoMQ is written in Java and dino in Vala. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AutoMQ or dino?

Choose AutoMQ if you want the larger community (10,789 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose dino if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.