head to head · open source

AutoMQ vs routr

AutoMQ has 10,805 GitHub stars, 770 forks, 60 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. routr has 1,709 stars, 180 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. AutoMQ leads on adoption by 532% (10,805 vs 1,709 stars). AutoMQ is written in Java under Apache-2.0; routr is written in TypeScript under MIT. AutoMQ has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, routr 11%. AutoMQ was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AutoMQ ★ 11K routr ★ 1.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

AutoMQ routr
GitHub stars ★ 11K ★ 1.7K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-08
Forks ⑂ 770 ⑂ 180
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AutoMQ if

  • You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AutoMQ profile →

pick routr if

  • You want the routr feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and routr fits your workflow better

full routr profile →

About AutoMQ

AutoMQ is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Java based diskless distribution of Kafka that keeps stream data on S3 instead of broker local disks, aimed at platform and infrastructure teams running event streaming at cloud scale.

read the full AutoMQ overview →

About routr

Routr is an MIT licensed, TypeScript based SIP proxy, location server and registrar that gives telephony carriers, communication service providers and integrators a reliable, scalable and programmable SIP infrastructure deployable with Docker, Compose or a Kubernetes Helm chart.

read the full routr overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

automq vs soketi automq vs timeplus automq vs sequin automq vs trench automq vs hook0 automq vs operational automq vs workbench soketi vs timeplus n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

AutoMQ vs kafka AutoMQ vs nats-server AutoMQ vs webrtc AutoMQ vs Soketi AutoMQ vs MadelineProto AutoMQ vs dino AutoMQ vs Timeplus AutoMQ vs Sequin AutoMQ vs SIP.js AutoMQ vs Trench AutoMQ vs Hook0 AutoMQ vs Operational

Frequently asked questions

Is AutoMQ or routr more popular?

AutoMQ has 10,805 GitHub stars and routr has 1,709. AutoMQ has the larger community by that measure.

Are AutoMQ and routr free?

Both are open source. AutoMQ is licensed under Apache-2.0 and routr under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AutoMQ and routr?

AutoMQ is written in Java and routr in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AutoMQ or routr?

Choose AutoMQ if you want the larger community (10,805 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose routr if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.