head to head · open source

kafka vs nats-server

kafka has 33,750 GitHub stars, 15,521 forks, 574 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nats-server has 20,745 stars, 1,962 forks, 472 open issues and last shipped yesterday. kafka leads on adoption by 63% (33,750 vs 20,745 stars). kafka is written in Java under Apache-2.0; nats-server is written in Go under Apache-2.0. kafka has attracted 46% as many forks as stars, nats-server 9%. kafka was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

kafka ★ 34K nats-server ★ 21K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

kafka nats-server
GitHub stars ★ 34K ★ 21K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 2.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick kafka if

  • You weight community size — 34K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full kafka profile →

pick nats-server if

  • You want the nats-server feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and nats-server fits your workflow better

full nats-server profile →

About kafka

Apache Kafka is an open source distributed event streaming platform, written in Java and Scala, for organizations that need high performance data pipelines, streaming analytics, data integration, and mission critical applications.

read the full kafka overview →

About nats-server

nats server is the Go based, Apache 2.0 licensed server at the heart of NATS, a simple, secure and performant communications system for digital systems, services and devices, aimed at teams building distributed systems, microservices, and cloud, edge or connected vehicle deployments that need messaging without running heavyweight broker infrastructure.

read the full nats-server overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

automq vs soketi automq vs timeplus automq vs sequin automq vs trench automq vs hook0 automq vs operational automq vs workbench soketi vs timeplus n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

kafka vs webrtc kafka vs AutoMQ kafka vs Soketi kafka vs MadelineProto kafka vs dino kafka vs Timeplus kafka vs Sequin kafka vs Trench kafka vs Hook0 kafka vs Operational kafka vs Workbench

Frequently asked questions

Is kafka or nats-server more popular?

kafka has 33,750 GitHub stars and nats-server has 20,745. kafka has the larger community by that measure.

Are kafka and nats-server free?

Both are open source. kafka is licensed under Apache-2.0 and nats-server under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between kafka and nats-server?

kafka is written in Java and nats-server in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, kafka or nats-server?

Choose kafka if you want the larger community (33,750 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose nats-server if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.