head to head · open source

AutoMQ vs Telephone

AutoMQ has 10,819 GitHub stars, 771 forks, 60 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Telephone has 1,169 stars, 233 forks, 132 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. AutoMQ leads on adoption by 825% (10,819 vs 1,169 stars). AutoMQ is written in Java under Apache-2.0; Telephone is written in Swift under GPL-3.0. AutoMQ has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Telephone 20%. AutoMQ was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AutoMQ ★ 11K Telephone ★ 1.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

AutoMQ Telephone
GitHub stars ★ 11K ★ 1.2K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Java Swift
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 771 ⑂ 233
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AutoMQ if

  • You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AutoMQ profile →

pick Telephone if

  • You want the Telephone feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and Telephone fits your workflow better

full Telephone profile →

About AutoMQ

AutoMQ is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Java based diskless distribution of Kafka that keeps stream data on S3 instead of broker local disks, aimed at platform and infrastructure teams running event streaming at cloud scale.

read the full AutoMQ overview →

About Telephone

Telephone is a GPL 3.0 licensed VoIP SIP softphone for macOS, written in Swift, that lets anyone whose phone line speaks SIP place and answer calls over the Internet or a company network from a Mac instead of a physical phone.

read the full Telephone overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

kafka vs automq kafka vs nats-server kafka vs webrtc kafka vs soketi nats-server vs webrtc kafka vs madelineproto kafka vs dino kafka vs timeplus n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

AutoMQ vs kafka AutoMQ vs nats-server AutoMQ vs webrtc AutoMQ vs Soketi AutoMQ vs MadelineProto AutoMQ vs dino AutoMQ vs Timeplus AutoMQ vs Sequin AutoMQ vs SIP.js AutoMQ vs routr AutoMQ vs Trench AutoMQ vs Hook0

Frequently asked questions

Is AutoMQ or Telephone more popular?

AutoMQ has 10,819 GitHub stars and Telephone has 1,169. AutoMQ has the larger community by that measure.

Are AutoMQ and Telephone free?

Both are open source. AutoMQ is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Telephone under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AutoMQ and Telephone?

AutoMQ is written in Java and Telephone in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AutoMQ or Telephone?

Choose AutoMQ if you want the larger community (10,819 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Telephone if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.