head to head · open source

kafka vs Timeplus

kafka has 33,750 GitHub stars, 15,521 forks, 574 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Timeplus has 2,260 stars, 112 forks, 77 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. kafka leads on adoption by 1,393% (33,750 vs 2,260 stars). kafka is written in Java under Apache-2.0; Timeplus is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. kafka has attracted 46% as many forks as stars, Timeplus 5%. kafka was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

kafka ★ 34K Timeplus ★ 2.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

kafka Timeplus
GitHub stars ★ 34K ★ 2.3K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java C++
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 112
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick kafka if

  • You weight community size — 34K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full kafka profile →

pick Timeplus if

  • You want the Timeplus feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and Timeplus fits your workflow better

full Timeplus profile →

About kafka

Apache Kafka is an open source distributed event streaming platform, written in Java and Scala, for organizations that need high performance data pipelines, streaming analytics, data integration, and mission critical applications.

read the full kafka overview →

About Timeplus

Timeplus Proton is an open source stream processing engine written in C++ and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It is presented as a single binary SQL pipeline engine for real time analytics, observability, ETL, and AI context. It lives in the messaging and event streaming ecosystem, with topic links to Kafka, ClickHouse, Flink, ksqlDB, Iceberg, and observability.

read the full Timeplus overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

automq vs timeplus soketi vs timeplus automq vs soketi automq vs sequin automq vs trench automq vs hook0 automq vs operational automq vs workbench n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

kafka vs nats-server kafka vs webrtc kafka vs AutoMQ kafka vs Soketi kafka vs MadelineProto kafka vs dino kafka vs Sequin kafka vs Trench kafka vs Hook0 kafka vs Operational kafka vs Workbench

Frequently asked questions

Is kafka or Timeplus more popular?

kafka has 33,750 GitHub stars and Timeplus has 2,260. kafka has the larger community by that measure.

Are kafka and Timeplus free?

Both are open source. kafka is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Timeplus under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between kafka and Timeplus?

kafka is written in Java and Timeplus in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, kafka or Timeplus?

Choose kafka if you want the larger community (33,750 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Timeplus if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.