head to head · open source

AutoMQ vs MadelineProto

AutoMQ has 10,789 GitHub stars, 771 forks, 60 open issues and last shipped yesterday. MadelineProto has 3,517 stars, 902 forks, 75 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AutoMQ leads on adoption by 207% (10,789 vs 3,517 stars). AutoMQ is written in Java under Apache-2.0; MadelineProto is written in PHP under AGPL-3.0. AutoMQ has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, MadelineProto 26%. AutoMQ was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AutoMQ ★ 11K MadelineProto ★ 3.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

AutoMQ MadelineProto
GitHub stars ★ 11K ★ 3.5K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Java PHP
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 771 ⑂ 902
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AutoMQ if

  • You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AutoMQ profile →

pick MadelineProto if

  • You want the MadelineProto feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and MadelineProto fits your workflow better

full MadelineProto profile →

About AutoMQ

AutoMQ is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Java based diskless distribution of Kafka that keeps stream data on S3 instead of broker local disks, aimed at platform and infrastructure teams running event streaming at cloud scale.

read the full AutoMQ overview →

About MadelineProto

MadelineProto is an async PHP client API for the Telegram MTProto protocol, built for PHP developers who need to interact with Telegram the way the official apps do, without going through the Telegram Bot API.

read the full MadelineProto overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

automq vs soketi automq vs timeplus automq vs sequin automq vs trench automq vs hook0 automq vs operational automq vs workbench soketi vs timeplus n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

AutoMQ vs kafka AutoMQ vs nats-server AutoMQ vs webrtc AutoMQ vs Soketi AutoMQ vs dino AutoMQ vs Timeplus AutoMQ vs Sequin AutoMQ vs Trench AutoMQ vs Hook0 AutoMQ vs Operational AutoMQ vs Workbench

Frequently asked questions

Is AutoMQ or MadelineProto more popular?

AutoMQ has 10,789 GitHub stars and MadelineProto has 3,517. AutoMQ has the larger community by that measure.

Are AutoMQ and MadelineProto free?

Both are open source. AutoMQ is licensed under Apache-2.0 and MadelineProto under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AutoMQ and MadelineProto?

AutoMQ is written in Java and MadelineProto in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AutoMQ or MadelineProto?

Choose AutoMQ if you want the larger community (10,789 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose MadelineProto if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.