head to head · open source

kafka vs AutoMQ

kafka has 33,750 GitHub stars, 15,521 forks, 574 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AutoMQ has 10,789 stars, 771 forks, 60 open issues and last shipped yesterday. kafka leads on adoption by 213% (33,750 vs 10,789 stars). kafka is written in Java under Apache-2.0; AutoMQ is written in Java under Apache-2.0. kafka has attracted 46% as many forks as stars, AutoMQ 7%. kafka was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (kafka), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

kafka ★ 34K AutoMQ ★ 11K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

kafka AutoMQ
GitHub stars ★ 34K ★ 11K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 771
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick kafka if

  • You weight community size — 34K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full kafka profile →

pick AutoMQ if

  • You want the AutoMQ feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and AutoMQ fits your workflow better

full AutoMQ profile →

About kafka

Apache Kafka is an open source distributed event streaming platform, written in Java and Scala, for organizations that need high performance data pipelines, streaming analytics, data integration, and mission critical applications.

read the full kafka overview →

About AutoMQ

AutoMQ is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Java based diskless distribution of Kafka that keeps stream data on S3 instead of broker local disks, aimed at platform and infrastructure teams running event streaming at cloud scale.

read the full AutoMQ overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

automq vs soketi automq vs timeplus automq vs sequin automq vs trench automq vs hook0 automq vs operational automq vs workbench soketi vs timeplus n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

kafka vs nats-server kafka vs webrtc kafka vs Soketi kafka vs MadelineProto kafka vs dino kafka vs Timeplus kafka vs Sequin kafka vs Trench kafka vs Hook0 kafka vs Operational kafka vs Workbench

Frequently asked questions

Is kafka or AutoMQ more popular?

kafka has 33,750 GitHub stars and AutoMQ has 10,789. kafka has the larger community by that measure.

Are kafka and AutoMQ free?

Both are open source. kafka is licensed under Apache-2.0 and AutoMQ under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between kafka and AutoMQ?

kafka is written in Java and AutoMQ in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, kafka or AutoMQ?

Choose kafka if you want the larger community (33,750 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose AutoMQ if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.