head to head · open source
ansible vs conductor
ansible has 70,719 GitHub stars, 24,336 forks, 837 open issues and last shipped yesterday. conductor has 32,207 stars, 1,009 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ansible leads on adoption by 120% (70,719 vs 32,207 stars). ansible is written in Python under GPL-3.0; conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0. ansible has attracted 34% as many forks as stars, conductor 3%. ansible was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 13541 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ansible | conductor | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 71K | ★ 32K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Java |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 24K | ⑂ 1.0K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ansible if
- You weight community size — 71K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick conductor if
- You want the conductor feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and conductor fits your workflow better
About ansible
Ansible is a radically simple, agentless IT automation platform, written in Python and licensed under GPL 3.0, that handles configuration management, application deployment, cloud provisioning, ad hoc task execution, network automation, and multi node orchestration for operators, developers, and network and cloud teams who manage machines over plain SSH.
read the full ansible overview →
About conductor
Conductor is an Apache 2.0 licensed, event driven agentic workflow engine written in Java that provides durable and highly resilient execution for applications and AI agents, aimed at teams running microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs that need orchestration they can version, inspect, and recover.
read the full conductor overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ansible or conductor more popular?
ansible has 70,719 GitHub stars and conductor has 32,207. ansible has the larger community by that measure.
Are ansible and conductor free?
Both are open source. ansible is licensed under GPL-3.0 and conductor under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ansible and conductor?
ansible is written in Python and conductor in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ansible or conductor?
Choose ansible if you want the larger community (70,719 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose conductor if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.