head to head · open source

AutoMQ vs Soketi

AutoMQ has 10,775 GitHub stars, 771 forks, 60 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Soketi has 5,634 stars, 363 forks, 142 open issues and last shipped 1.5 years ago. AutoMQ leads on adoption by 91% (10,775 vs 5,634 stars). AutoMQ is written in Java under Apache-2.0; Soketi is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. AutoMQ has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Soketi 6%. AutoMQ was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AutoMQ ★ 11K Soketi ★ 5.6K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

AutoMQ Soketi
GitHub stars ★ 11K ★ 5.6K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Java TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2025-03-03
Forks ⑂ 771 ⑂ 363
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AutoMQ if

  • You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AutoMQ profile →

pick Soketi if

  • You want the Soketi feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Soketi fits your workflow better

full Soketi profile →

About AutoMQ

AutoMQ is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Java based diskless distribution of Kafka that keeps stream data on S3 instead of broker local disks, aimed at platform and infrastructure teams running event streaming at cloud scale.

read the full AutoMQ overview →

About Soketi

Soketi is an open source, Pusher compatible WebSockets server written in TypeScript that lets developers run their own real time channels infrastructure instead of paying for a hosted Pusher plan.

read the full Soketi overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

automq vs timeplus automq vs sequin automq vs trench automq vs hook0 automq vs operational automq vs workbench soketi vs timeplus uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

AutoMQ vs Timeplus AutoMQ vs Sequin AutoMQ vs Trench AutoMQ vs Hook0 AutoMQ vs Operational AutoMQ vs Workbench

Frequently asked questions

Is AutoMQ or Soketi more popular?

AutoMQ has 10,775 GitHub stars and Soketi has 5,634. AutoMQ has the larger community by that measure.

Are AutoMQ and Soketi free?

Both are open source. AutoMQ is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Soketi under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AutoMQ and Soketi?

AutoMQ is written in Java and Soketi in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AutoMQ or Soketi?

Choose AutoMQ if you want the larger community (10,775 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Soketi if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.