head to head · open source

kafka vs dino

kafka has 33,750 GitHub stars, 15,521 forks, 574 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dino has 2,489 stars, 281 forks, 684 open issues and last shipped 29 days ago. kafka leads on adoption by 1,256% (33,750 vs 2,489 stars). kafka is written in Java under Apache-2.0; dino is written in Vala under GPL-3.0. kafka has attracted 46% as many forks as stars, dino 11%. kafka was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

kafka ★ 34K dino ★ 2.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

kafka dino
GitHub stars ★ 34K ★ 2.5K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Java Vala
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-08-21
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 281
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick kafka if

  • You weight community size — 34K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full kafka profile →

pick dino if

  • You want the dino feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Vala
  • You evaluated both and dino fits your workflow better

full dino profile →

About kafka

Apache Kafka is an open source distributed event streaming platform, written in Java and Scala, for organizations that need high performance data pipelines, streaming analytics, data integration, and mission critical applications.

read the full kafka overview →

About dino

Dino is a modern XMPP ("Jabber") chat client for the Linux desktop, built with GTK and Vala, and it is aimed at Linux users who want a native desktop messenger for calls, encryption, file transfers, and group chats on the open XMPP network.

read the full dino overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

automq vs soketi automq vs timeplus automq vs sequin automq vs trench automq vs hook0 automq vs operational automq vs workbench soketi vs timeplus n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

kafka vs nats-server kafka vs webrtc kafka vs AutoMQ kafka vs Soketi kafka vs MadelineProto kafka vs Timeplus kafka vs Sequin kafka vs Trench kafka vs Hook0 kafka vs Operational kafka vs Workbench

Frequently asked questions

Is kafka or dino more popular?

kafka has 33,750 GitHub stars and dino has 2,489. kafka has the larger community by that measure.

Are kafka and dino free?

Both are open source. kafka is licensed under Apache-2.0 and dino under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between kafka and dino?

kafka is written in Java and dino in Vala. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, kafka or dino?

Choose kafka if you want the larger community (33,750 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose dino if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.