head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs worldmonitor
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars, 8,426 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. worldmonitor has 86,684 stars, 13,147 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 6% (91,477 vs 86,684 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, worldmonitor 15%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | worldmonitor | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 87K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 13K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick worldmonitor if
- You want the worldmonitor feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and worldmonitor fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About worldmonitor
World Monitor is an open source, real time global intelligence dashboard in TypeScript that aggregates news with AI, monitors geopolitics and infrastructure, and unifies all of it into a single situational awareness interface for analysts, journalists, researchers, and operations teams who need cross domain awareness they can self host.
read the full worldmonitor overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or worldmonitor more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars and worldmonitor has 86,684. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and worldmonitor free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and worldmonitor under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and worldmonitor?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and worldmonitor in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or worldmonitor?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,477 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose worldmonitor if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.