head to head · open source
three.js vs zinx
three.js has 115,636 GitHub stars, 36,557 forks, 386 open issues and last shipped yesterday. zinx has 7,764 stars, 1,262 forks, 96 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. three.js leads on adoption by 1,389% (115,636 vs 7,764 stars). three.js is written in JavaScript under MIT; zinx is written in Go under MIT. three.js has attracted 32% as many forks as stars, zinx 16%. three.js was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 15422 open source comparisons
Side by side
| three.js | zinx | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 116K | ★ 7.8K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-06-06 |
| Forks | ⑂ 37K | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick three.js if
- You weight community size — 116K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick zinx if
- You want the zinx feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and zinx fits your workflow better
About three.js
three.js is an MIT licensed JavaScript 3D library that provides an easy to use, lightweight, cross browser, general purpose layer for rendering interactive 3D graphics in the browser, aimed at JavaScript developers who need 3D scenes on the web without writing raw GPU code.
read the full three.js overview →
About zinx
Zinx is a lightweight concurrent server framework written in Go, aimed at developers who want a small, readable TCP server skeleton they can study and customise rather than adopt a large opaque application framework.
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Gaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is three.js or zinx more popular?
three.js has 115,636 GitHub stars and zinx has 7,764. three.js has the larger community by that measure.
Are three.js and zinx free?
Both are open source. three.js is licensed under MIT and zinx under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between three.js and zinx?
three.js is written in JavaScript and zinx in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, three.js or zinx?
Choose three.js if you want the larger community (115,636 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose zinx if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.