head to head · open source
three.js vs zinx
three.js has 117,439 GitHub stars, 36,894 forks, 386 open issues and last shipped yesterday. zinx has 7,759 stars, 1,262 forks, 96 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. three.js leads on adoption by 1,414% (117,439 vs 7,759 stars). three.js is written in JavaScript under MIT; zinx is written in Go under MIT. three.js has attracted 31% as many forks as stars, zinx 16%. three.js was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| three.js | zinx | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 117K | ★ 7.8K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-22 |
| Forks | ⑂ 37K | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick three.js if
- You weight community size — 117K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick zinx if
- You want the zinx feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and zinx fits your workflow better
About three.js
three.js [![NPM Package][npm]][npm url] [![Build Size][build size]][build size url] [![NPM Downloads][npm downloads]][npmtrends url] [![jsDelivr Downloads][jsdelivr downloads]][jsdelivr url] [![Discord][discord]][discord url] JavaScript 3D library The aim of the project is to create an easy to use, lightweight, cross browser, general purpose 3D library. The current builds only include WebGL and WebGPU renderers but SVG and CSS3D renderers are also available as addons. Examples — Docs — Manual — Wiki — Migrating — Questions — Forum — Discord Usage This code creates a…
read the full three.js overview →
About zinx
English 简体中文 Zinx is a lightweight concurrent server framework based on Golang. Document Note : Zinx has been widely used in many enterprises for development purposes, including message forwarding for backend modules, long linked game servers, and message handling plugins for web frameworks. Zinx is positioned as a framework with concise code that allows developers to quickly understand the internal details of the framework and easily customize it based on their own enterprise scenarios. Source of Zinx Website Online Tutorial Online Tutorial Video I. One word that has been said before Why did we create Zinx?…
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Gaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is three.js or zinx more popular?
three.js has 117,439 GitHub stars and zinx has 7,759. three.js has the larger community by that measure.
Are three.js and zinx free?
Both are open source. three.js is licensed under MIT and zinx under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between three.js and zinx?
three.js is written in JavaScript and zinx in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, three.js or zinx?
Choose three.js if you want the larger community (117,439 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose zinx if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.