head to head · open source

three.js vs bevy

three.js has 115,636 GitHub stars, 36,557 forks, 386 open issues and last shipped yesterday. bevy has 48,268 stars, 4,846 forks, 3,418 open issues and last shipped yesterday. three.js leads on adoption by 140% (115,636 vs 48,268 stars). three.js is written in JavaScript under MIT; bevy is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. three.js has attracted 32% as many forks as stars, bevy 10%. bevy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

three.js ★ 116K bevy ★ 48K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

three.js bevy
GitHub stars ★ 116K ★ 48K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 37K ⑂ 4.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick three.js if

  • You weight community size — 116K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full three.js profile →

pick bevy if

  • You want the bevy feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and bevy fits your workflow better

full bevy profile →

About three.js

three.js is an MIT licensed JavaScript 3D library that provides an easy to use, lightweight, cross browser, general purpose layer for rendering interactive 3D graphics in the browser, aimed at JavaScript developers who need 3D scenes on the web without writing raw GPU code.

read the full three.js overview →

About bevy

Bevy is a free and open source, data driven game engine written in Rust that gives developers a complete 2D and 3D feature set through an Entity Component System architecture, and it is aimed at Rust programmers building games and interactive applications who accept an early stage engine that ships breaking API changes roughly every three months.

read the full bevy overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs parlant

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

three.js vs Godot three.js vs imgui three.js vs raylib three.js vs GDevelop three.js vs MonoGame three.js vs Pumpkin three.js vs azerothcore-wotlk three.js vs zinx three.js vs s&box three.js vs pokerth

Frequently asked questions

Is three.js or bevy more popular?

three.js has 115,636 GitHub stars and bevy has 48,268. three.js has the larger community by that measure.

Are three.js and bevy free?

Both are open source. three.js is licensed under MIT and bevy under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between three.js and bevy?

three.js is written in JavaScript and bevy in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, three.js or bevy?

Choose three.js if you want the larger community (115,636 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose bevy if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.