head to head · open source
three.js vs OctoBot
three.js has 115,666 GitHub stars, 36,556 forks, 386 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OctoBot has 6,591 stars, 1,276 forks, 167 open issues and last shipped yesterday. three.js leads on adoption by 1,655% (115,666 vs 6,591 stars). three.js is written in JavaScript under MIT; OctoBot is written in Python under GPL-3.0. three.js has attracted 32% as many forks as stars, OctoBot 19%. OctoBot was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| three.js | OctoBot | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 116K | ★ 6.6K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 37K | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick three.js if
- You weight community size — 116K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick OctoBot if
- You want the OctoBot feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and OctoBot fits your workflow better
About three.js
three.js is an MIT licensed JavaScript 3D library that provides an easy to use, lightweight, cross browser, general purpose layer for rendering interactive 3D graphics in the browser, aimed at JavaScript developers who need 3D scenes on the web without writing raw GPU code.
read the full three.js overview →
About OctoBot
OctoBot is a free, open source cryptocurrency trading bot written in Python and released under the GPL 3.0 license. It lives in the cryptocurrency and blockchain ecosystem, and it is distributed as a Python package on PyPI as well as a Docker image published under drakkarsoftware/octobot . The project presents itself as a trading robot with a visual user interface, aimed at crypto investors who want to automate their investment strategies rather than place every order by hand. It is backed by a sizeable community, with roughly 6,576 stars and 1,273 forks on GitHub, and it is developed in the open by Drakkar Softw…
read the full OctoBot overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Gaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is three.js or OctoBot more popular?
three.js has 115,666 GitHub stars and OctoBot has 6,591. three.js has the larger community by that measure.
Are three.js and OctoBot free?
Both are open source. three.js is licensed under MIT and OctoBot under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between three.js and OctoBot?
three.js is written in JavaScript and OctoBot in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, three.js or OctoBot?
Choose three.js if you want the larger community (115,666 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OctoBot if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.