head to head · open source

three.js vs raylib

three.js has 115,636 GitHub stars, 36,557 forks, 386 open issues and last shipped yesterday. raylib has 34,783 stars, 3,299 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped yesterday. three.js leads on adoption by 232% (115,636 vs 34,783 stars). three.js is written in JavaScript under MIT; raylib is written in C under Zlib. three.js has attracted 32% as many forks as stars, raylib 9%. three.js was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

three.js ★ 116K raylib ★ 35K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

three.js raylib
GitHub stars ★ 116K ★ 35K
License MIT Zlib
Written in JavaScript C
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 37K ⑂ 3.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick three.js if

  • You weight community size — 116K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full three.js profile →

pick raylib if

  • You want the raylib feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Zlib license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and raylib fits your workflow better

full raylib profile →

About three.js

three.js is an MIT licensed JavaScript 3D library that provides an easy to use, lightweight, cross browser, general purpose layer for rendering interactive 3D graphics in the browser, aimed at JavaScript developers who need 3D scenes on the web without writing raw GPU code.

read the full three.js overview →

About raylib

raylib is an open source, Zlib licensed C programming library for building videogames and graphical applications, aimed at programmers who would rather write code directly than work inside a visual game engine editor.

read the full raylib overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs parlant

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

three.js vs Godot three.js vs imgui three.js vs bevy three.js vs GDevelop three.js vs MonoGame three.js vs Pumpkin three.js vs azerothcore-wotlk three.js vs zinx three.js vs s&box three.js vs pokerth

Frequently asked questions

Is three.js or raylib more popular?

three.js has 115,636 GitHub stars and raylib has 34,783. three.js has the larger community by that measure.

Are three.js and raylib free?

Both are open source. three.js is licensed under MIT and raylib under Zlib. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between three.js and raylib?

three.js is written in JavaScript and raylib in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, three.js or raylib?

Choose three.js if you want the larger community (115,636 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose raylib if its feature set, stack or Zlib licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.