head to head · open source

three.js vs MonoGame

three.js has 115,636 GitHub stars, 36,557 forks, 386 open issues and last shipped yesterday. MonoGame has 14,431 stars, 3,107 forks, 766 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. three.js leads on adoption by 701% (115,636 vs 14,431 stars). three.js is written in JavaScript under MIT; MonoGame is written in C# under a custom or non-standard licence. three.js has attracted 32% as many forks as stars, MonoGame 22%. three.js was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (3d), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

three.js ★ 116K MonoGame ★ 14K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

three.js MonoGame
GitHub stars ★ 116K ★ 14K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in JavaScript C#
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 37K ⑂ 3.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick three.js if

  • You weight community size — 116K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full three.js profile →

pick MonoGame if

  • You want the MonoGame feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and MonoGame fits your workflow better

full MonoGame profile →

About three.js

three.js is an MIT licensed JavaScript 3D library that provides an easy to use, lightweight, cross browser, general purpose layer for rendering interactive 3D graphics in the browser, aimed at JavaScript developers who need 3D scenes on the web without writing raw GPU code.

read the full three.js overview →

About MonoGame

MonoGame is a free, open source C and .NET game framework for building cross platform games. It lives in the .NET game development ecosystem and is positioned as one framework for creating games on desktop PCs, mobile devices, and consoles. It is an open source re implementation of Microsoft's discontinued XNA Framework, used to create games such as Streets of Rage 4, Carrion, Celeste, and Stardew Valley.

read the full MonoGame overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs monogame godot vs monogame firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs parlant

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

three.js vs Godot three.js vs imgui three.js vs bevy three.js vs raylib three.js vs GDevelop three.js vs Pumpkin three.js vs azerothcore-wotlk three.js vs zinx three.js vs s&box three.js vs pokerth

Frequently asked questions

Is three.js or MonoGame more popular?

three.js has 115,636 GitHub stars and MonoGame has 14,431. three.js has the larger community by that measure.

Are three.js and MonoGame free?

Both are open source. three.js is licensed under MIT, and MonoGame has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between three.js and MonoGame?

three.js is written in JavaScript and MonoGame in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, three.js or MonoGame?

Choose three.js if you want the larger community (115,636 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose MonoGame if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.