head to head · open source

Shotcut vs ai-video-editor

Shotcut has 15,270 GitHub stars, 1,513 forks, 52 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. ai-video-editor has 859 stars, 108 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Shotcut leads on adoption by 1,678% (15,270 vs 859 stars). Shotcut is written in C++ under GPL-3.0; ai-video-editor is written in JavaScript under MIT. Shotcut has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, ai-video-editor 13%. Shotcut was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Shotcut ★ 15K ai-video-editor ★ 859 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Shotcut ai-video-editor
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 859
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in C++ JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-09-21
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 108
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Shotcut if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Shotcut profile →

pick ai-video-editor if

  • You want the ai-video-editor feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and ai-video-editor fits your workflow better

full ai-video-editor profile →

About Shotcut

Shotcut is a free, open source, cross platform video editor written in C++ and released under the GPL 3.0 license. It lives in the Qt and MLT ecosystem, using Qt for its application and user interface and MLT as its multimedia authoring framework. It provides regularly built binaries for Linux, macOS, and Windows, and is positioned as an open alternative to Adobe Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve (Studio).

read the full Shotcut overview →

About ai-video-editor

Timeline Studio, published on GitHub as ai video editor, is an MIT licensed, local first video editor that runs in the browser, built for creators and AI agent developers who edit the same real multi track timeline.

read the full ai-video-editor overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 184K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs shotcut opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

Shotcut vs OpenCut Shotcut vs LosslessCut Shotcut vs sharp Shotcut vs rembg Shotcut vs Audacity Shotcut vs filepond Shotcut vs ImageToolbox Shotcut vs palmier-pro Shotcut vs Darktable Shotcut vs libvips Shotcut vs imgproxy Shotcut vs Krita

Frequently asked questions

Is Shotcut or ai-video-editor more popular?

Shotcut has 15,270 GitHub stars and ai-video-editor has 859. Shotcut has the larger community by that measure.

Are Shotcut and ai-video-editor free?

Both are open source. Shotcut is licensed under GPL-3.0 and ai-video-editor under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Shotcut and ai-video-editor?

Shotcut is written in C++ and ai-video-editor in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Shotcut or ai-video-editor?

Choose Shotcut if you want the larger community (15,270 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose ai-video-editor if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.