head to head · open source
code-review-graph vs Reflex
code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars, 2,964 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Reflex has 28,987 stars, 1,827 forks, 346 open issues and last shipped yesterday. code-review-graph leads on adoption by 12% (32,563 vs 28,987 stars). code-review-graph is written in Python under MIT; Reflex is written in Python under Apache-2.0. code-review-graph has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Reflex 6%. Reflex was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (python), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| code-review-graph | Reflex | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 29K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-29 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.0K | ⑂ 1.8K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick code-review-graph if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Reflex if
- You want the Reflex feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Reflex fits your workflow better
About code-review-graph
code review graph Stop burning tokens. Start reviewing smarter. English 简体中文 日本語 한국어 हिन्दी Usage · Commands · FAQ · Troubleshooting · GitHub Action · Reproducing the benchmarks · Roadmap AI coding tools can end up re reading large parts of your codebase on review tasks. code review graph fixes that. It builds a structural map of your code with Tree sitter, tracks changes incrementally, and gives your AI assistant precise context via MCP so it reads only what matters. Quick Start One command sets up everything. install detects which AI coding tools you have, writes the correct MCP configuration for each one…
read the full code-review-graph overview →
About Reflex
✨ Performant, customizable web apps in pure Python. Deploy in seconds. ✨ [!NOTE] Build faster with Reflex: AI Builder Generate full stack Reflex apps in seconds. Agent Toolkit Connect MCP and Skills to your coding assistant. App Management Deploy and manage your Reflex apps. Introduction Reflex is a library to build full stack web apps in pure Python. Key features: Pure Python Write your app's frontend and backend all in Python, no need to learn Javascript. Full Flexibility Reflex is easy to get started with, but can also scale to complex apps. See our architecture page to learn how Reflex works under the hood…
read the full Reflex overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is code-review-graph or Reflex more popular?
code-review-graph has 32,563 GitHub stars and Reflex has 28,987. code-review-graph has the larger community by that measure.
Are code-review-graph and Reflex free?
Both are open source. code-review-graph is licensed under MIT and Reflex under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between code-review-graph and Reflex?
code-review-graph is written in Python and Reflex in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, code-review-graph or Reflex?
Choose code-review-graph if you want the larger community (32,563 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Reflex if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.